Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Cialdini, L. Demaine, Brad Sagarin, Daniel Barrett, Kelton Rhoads, P. Winter (2006)
Managing social norms for persuasive impactSocial Influence, 1
A. Blais, Carol Galais (2016)
Measuring the civic duty to vote: A proposalElectoral Studies, 41
Allecia Reid, L. Aiken (2013)
Correcting injunctive norm misperceptions motivates behavior change: a randomized controlled sun protection intervention.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 32 5
R. Bernstein, A. Chadha, R. Montjoy (2001)
Overreporting voting: why it happens and why it matters.Public opinion quarterly, 65 1
R. Rimal, K. Real (2003)
Understanding the Influence of Perceived Norms on BehaviorsCommunication Theory, 13
Anasatsia Danilov, Kiryl Khalmetski, Dirk Sliwka (2018)
Norms and GuiltGames & Political Behavior eJournal
C. Neighbors, Roisin O'Connor, Melissa Lewis, Neharika Chawla, Christine Lee, Nicole Fossos (2008)
The relative impact of injunctive norms on college student drinking: the role of reference group.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 22 4
Kimmo Eriksson, Pontus Strimling, Julie Coultas (2015)
Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive normsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129
P. Gollwitzer (1993)
Goal Achievement: The Role of IntentionsEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 4
Ryan Jacobson, Chad Mortensen, R. Cialdini (2011)
Bodies obliged and unbound: differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms.Journal of personality and social psychology, 100 3
P. John, M. Sanders, Jennifer Wang (2014)
The Use of Descriptive Norms in Public Administration: A Panacea for Improving Citizen Behaviours?Law & Humanities eJournal
M. Brandimonte, G. Einstein, M. McDaniel (2014)
Prospective memory : theory and applications
C. Wolters (2004)
Advancing Achievement Goal Theory: Using Goal Structures and Goal Orientations to Predict Students' Motivation, Cognition, and Achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 96
Joanne Smith, W. Louis, D. Terry, Katharine Greenaway, Miranda Clarke, Xiaoliang Cheng (2012)
Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentionsJournal of Environmental Psychology, 32
Matthew Meisel, Adam Goodie (2014)
Descriptive and injunctive social norms' interactive role in gambling behavior.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 28 2
S. Constantino, A. Cooperman, Thiago Moreira (2021)
Voting in a global pandemic: Assessing dueling influences of Covid‐19 on turnoutSocial Science Quarterly, 102
G. Dubois, Benjamin Sovacool, C. Aall, M. Nilsson, C. Barbier, A. Herrmann, Sébastien Bruyère, Camilla Andersson, Bore Sköld, F. Nadaud, Florian Dorner, Karen Moberg, J. Ceron, H. Fischer, D. Amelung, Marta Baltruszewicz, Jeremy Fischer, Françoise Bénévise, V. Louis, R. Sauerborn (2019)
It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futuresEnergy Research & Social Science
Alexandre Morin-Chassé, Damien Bol, Laura Stephenson, Simon St-Vincent (2016)
How to Survey About Electoral Turnout? The Efficacy of the Face-Saving Response Items in 19 Different Contexts*Political Science Research and Methods, 5
C. Bégin (2008)
Les stratégies d’apprentissage : un cadre de référence simplifié, 34
Ryan Jacobson, Chad Mortensen, Kathryn Jacobson, R. Cialdini (2015)
Self-Control Moderates the Effectiveness of Influence Attempts Highlighting Injunctive Social NormsSocial Psychological and Personality Science, 6
Cameron Anderson, P. Loewen, R. Mcgregor (2018)
Implementation Intentions, Information, and Voter Turnout: An Experimental StudyPolitical Psychology, 39
Donald Taylor, R. Sablonnière (2013)
Why Interventions in Dysfunctional Communities Fail: The Need for a Truly Collective ApproachCanadian Psychology, 54
Christopher Mann (2010)
Is There Backlash to Social Pressure? A Large-scale Field Experiment on Voter MobilizationPolitical Behavior, 32
P. Gollwitzer (1996)
The Volitional Benefits of Planning
Neharika Chawla, C. Neighbors, Melissa Lewis, Christine Lee, M. Larimer (2007)
Attitudes and perceived approval of drinking as mediators of the relationship between the importance of religion and alcohol use.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 68 3
J. Pennock (1979)
Democratic Political Theory
F. Stok, D. Ridder, E. Vet, J. Wit (2014)
Don't tell me what I should do, but what others do: the influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents.British journal of health psychology, 19 1
B. Frey, Stephan Meier (2004)
Pro-social behavior in a natural settingJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 54
C. Neighbors, Lindsey Rodriguez, Dipali Rinker, Rubi Gonzales, Maigen Agana, J. Tackett, Dawn Foster (2015)
Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 83 3
N. Lawrence (2015)
Highlighting the injunctive norm to reduce phone-related distracted drivingSocial Influence, 10
A. Blais (2000)
To Vote or Not to Vote
P. Pintrich, David Smith, T. García, W. McKeachie (1993)
Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53
G. Murray, Richard Matland (2015)
“You've Gone Too Far”: Social Pressure Mobilization, Reactance, and Individual DifferencesJournal of Political Marketing, 14
David Nickerson, Todd Rogers (2010)
Do You Have a Voting Plan?Psychological Science, 21
Voting is highly valued in democratic societies. However, in recent years there has been a marked decline in voting. To realign voting behavior with democratic values, we turn to the study of injunctive‐norm interventions. These interventions advance that by making injunctive norms, the norms representing collective values, salient to a targeted group of individuals, individuals will likely conform to the promoted norm. However, studies testing the effectiveness of injunctive‐norm interventions have produced mixed results. We hypothesize that individuals with few plans to vote are those who will be most influenced by these interventions. Individuals with few plans should be more receptive to normative influence because they do not have preconceived commitments about how to engage with voting. Study 1 (N = 141) shows that injunctive‐norm interventions influence the voting behavior of those with few plans about voting. Studies 2 (N = 152) and 3 (N = 195) bring forth evidence that this influence is also present when the salient injunctive norms are from close meaningful groups, such as family and friends.
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2023
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.