Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2004)
‘ A development perspective on Cancun ’
N. Mandela (1993)
South Africa's Future Foreign PolicyForeign Affairs, 72
J. Ruggie (1994)
Third Try at World Order? America and Multilateralism after the Cold WarPolitical Science Quarterly, 109
F. Ismail (2005)
A Development Perspective on the WTO July 2004 General Council DecisionJournal of International Economic Law, 8
H. Vos (1946)
Trade and IndustryThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 245
F. Ismail (2005)
The Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health and the Negotiations in the WTO on Paragraph 6-Why PhRMA Needs to Join the Consensus!The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 6
E. Kessie (2013)
The Future of the Doha Development Agenda
F. Ismail (2006)
How Can Least-Developed Countries and Other Small, Weak and Vulnerable Economies Also Gain from the Doha Development Agenda on the Road to Hong Kong?Journal of World Trade
(2003)
‘ America will not wait
(2003)
‘ What was the cause for the collapse of Cancun ? ’ Financial Times , 30 September .
Ismail Ismail (2008)
The G20 and the NAMA 11: Perspectives RevisitedThe Indian Journal of International Economic Law, 1
R. Ricupero (1998)
Integration of Developing Countries into the Multilateral Trading System
Erwin Erwin (2003)
What was the cause for the collapse of Cancun?Financial Times
J. O’Neill (2011)
Why we must stop talking about "emerging markets" (commentary by Jaideep Prabhu)
F. Ismail (2005)
Mainstreaming Development in the World Trade OrganizationJournal of World Trade
Ismail Ismail (2004a)
Agricultural Trade Liberalization and the Poor: A Development Perspective on CancunBRIDGES, 8
Ismail Ismail, Vickers Vickers (2011)
Towards fair and inclusive decision‐making in WTO negotiationsMaking Global Trade Governance Work for Development
Konstantinos Papadakis (2006)
Civil Society, Participatory Governanceand Decent Work Objectives: The case of South Africa
(2010)
‘ How Africa can become the next Bric ’ , Financial Times , 27 August
F. Ismail, Brendan Vickers (2011)
Making Global Trade Governance Work for Development: Towards fair and inclusive decision-making in WTO negotiations
S. Harbinson (2009)
The Doha Round: "death-defying agenda" or "don't do it again"?
Frederick Abbott (2005)
The WTO Medicines Decision: World Pharmaceutical Trade and the Protection of Public HealthAmerican Journal of International Law, 99
A. Narlikar, D. Tussie (2004)
The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTOWiley-Blackwell: World Economy
The paper argues that South Africa’s participation in the World Trade Organization (WTO) since the birth of its democracy in 1994 was informed by its domestic development challenges. It claims that South Africa’s values were derived from its long struggle against apartheid and its transition to a new democracy. South Africa’s political leadership in the Doha negotiations was also strengthened by its deep democratic institutions and consultative processes. South Africa’s values, articulated by Nelson Mandela, reflected a deep commitment to multilateralism and consensus building, fairness and justice, inclusiveness, and a concern to support and promote development, within South Africa, and also in developing countries, especially the African continent. The paper argues that the experiences of South Africa in the multilateral trading system have been inspired by the vision and principles set out by Nelson Mandela. This vision is based on the ‘idealist and aspirational’ discourse in foreign policy rather than the narrow ‘interest driven discourse of realism’. Policy Implications • South Africa’s experience in the multilateral system suggests that a normative or value based approach based on principles and values can be more successful in building consensus and fair and balanced multilateral agreements than the mercantilist and realist approaches adopted by the US in the Doha round. • Raising the awareness of US trade and foreign policy makers on the need to avoid being taken hostage by their narrow minded lobbies will be crucial for the success of multilateral negotiations. • EU trade and foreign policy makers need to build greater coherence between their more mercantilist approaches of their trade negotiators and human rights based approaches of their foreign policy negotiators. • Other members in the BRICS group, such as China, India, Russia and Brazil, can learn from the experiences of South Africa and strive to adopt more idealist and normative approaches to their multilateral trade negotiations, ensuring that they are more responsive to the needs of the smaller and poorer developing countries.
Global Policy – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.