Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Regulation of Speech and Media Coverage of Corruption: An Empirical Analysis of the Mexican Press

Regulation of Speech and Media Coverage of Corruption: An Empirical Analysis of the Mexican Press Restrictions to media freedom, in the form of repressive defamation legislation, are thought to affect the amount of information about corruption that the media report. Exploiting variation in regulation of speech across states in a federal country, Mexico, and using a novel data set based on content analysis of the local press, I estimate the effect of lack of freedom on the coverage devoted to acts of malfeasance by public officials. Corruption receives significantly less attention in states with a more repressive defamation law. Instrumental variable models corroborate the interpretation of the negative association between regulation and coverage as a causal “chilling effect.” http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Political Science Wiley

Regulation of Speech and Media Coverage of Corruption: An Empirical Analysis of the Mexican Press

American Journal of Political Science , Volume 59 (1) – Jan 1, 2015

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/regulation-of-speech-and-media-coverage-of-corruption-an-empirical-oImr0hUV0w

References (64)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
©2015 by the Midwest Political Science Association
ISSN
0092-5853
eISSN
1540-5907
DOI
10.1111/ajps.12110
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Restrictions to media freedom, in the form of repressive defamation legislation, are thought to affect the amount of information about corruption that the media report. Exploiting variation in regulation of speech across states in a federal country, Mexico, and using a novel data set based on content analysis of the local press, I estimate the effect of lack of freedom on the coverage devoted to acts of malfeasance by public officials. Corruption receives significantly less attention in states with a more repressive defamation law. Instrumental variable models corroborate the interpretation of the negative association between regulation and coverage as a causal “chilling effect.”

Journal

American Journal of Political ScienceWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.