Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Relationship between Research and Practice

Relationship between Research and Practice - How is “usefulness of research” linked to research legitimacy? - Journal rankings are increasingly viewed as exerting significant influence on research. How does practice influence business journal rankings (e.g., Financial Times ranking)? - On what basis can we separate the wheat from the chaff regarding accounting practitioners’ never-ending complaints regarding the relevance of accounting research? - What influence do organizations such as the AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) have on accounting research? Do practitioners’ values play a key role in this influence? - Have new public management and the reduction of state funding translated into academic research which is increasingly “captured” by practitioners? - How do the fields of accounting research and practice influence one another regarding the social reproduction of researchers and practitioners? - Which mechanisms are in place within large accounting firms to follow and/or oversee academic research? How is research “translated” in accounting firms’ practices? Are “recommendations to practice” made by a number of accounting researchers in their papers, and executive summaries found in a number of journals, useful to practitioners? - What role do accounting researchers play in the development and dissemination of “best practices” regarding accounting technologies and disclosures? http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Accounting Review Wiley

Relationship between Research and Practice

Australian Accounting Review , Volume 19 (1) – Mar 1, 2009
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/relationship-between-research-and-practice-ZUacD9ublu
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2009 CPA Australia
ISSN
1035-6908
eISSN
1835-2561
DOI
10.1111/j.1835-2561.2009.00044.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

- How is “usefulness of research” linked to research legitimacy? - Journal rankings are increasingly viewed as exerting significant influence on research. How does practice influence business journal rankings (e.g., Financial Times ranking)? - On what basis can we separate the wheat from the chaff regarding accounting practitioners’ never-ending complaints regarding the relevance of accounting research? - What influence do organizations such as the AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) have on accounting research? Do practitioners’ values play a key role in this influence? - Have new public management and the reduction of state funding translated into academic research which is increasingly “captured” by practitioners? - How do the fields of accounting research and practice influence one another regarding the social reproduction of researchers and practitioners? - Which mechanisms are in place within large accounting firms to follow and/or oversee academic research? How is research “translated” in accounting firms’ practices? Are “recommendations to practice” made by a number of accounting researchers in their papers, and executive summaries found in a number of journals, useful to practitioners? - What role do accounting researchers play in the development and dissemination of “best practices” regarding accounting technologies and disclosures?

Journal

Australian Accounting Review – Wiley

Published: Mar 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.