Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Subscribe now for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Religiosity, spirituality, and psychological distress in African‐Americans at risk for having a hereditary cancer predisposing gene mutation

Religiosity, spirituality, and psychological distress in African‐Americans at risk for having a... Elevated psychological distress has been observed among people at increased risk for familial cancer. Researchers consider religiosity and spirituality (RS) to be positive coping mechanisms associated with reduced psychological distress. Relatively little is known about the impact of RS on genomic health issues. The objectives of our study were: (1) describe the prevalence of RS and depressive symptoms and (2) explore how RS relates to psychological distress in a cohort of individuals with a ≥25% prior probability of a genetic predisposition to cancer. Participants (n = 99) were drawn from an African‐American, Louisiana‐based kindred with a mutation at the BRCA1 locus. This analysis reports findings from a survey assessing RS and the use of three types of religious coping styles: collaborative, self‐directing, and deferring. Clinically significant depressive symptoms were relatively high (27%); with females (33%) more likely than males (17%) to report symptoms (P < 0.01). The majority of participants reported being highly religious. The most commonly employed religious problem solving style used by participants was collaborative (${\rm \bar X = 22}{\rm .9}$; SD = 5.8) versus self‐directing (${\rm \bar X = 12}{\rm .8}$; SD = 5.1) and deferring (${\rm \bar X = 19}{\rm .9}$; SD = 6.3). We did not observe significant associations between RS indicators and psychological distress, nor did we observe appreciable differences related to gender or risk perception. Although RS beliefs and practices are important for many African‐Americans, we did not find evidence that indicators of self‐reported RS are associated with psychological distress prior to genetic counseling and testing. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A Wiley

Religiosity, spirituality, and psychological distress in African‐Americans at risk for having a hereditary cancer predisposing gene mutation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/religiosity-spirituality-and-psychological-distress-in-african-9lL0wzBbzX

References (42)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
"Copyright © 2009 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company"
ISSN
1552-4825
eISSN
1552-4833
DOI
10.1002/ajmg.c.30194
pmid
19170079
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Elevated psychological distress has been observed among people at increased risk for familial cancer. Researchers consider religiosity and spirituality (RS) to be positive coping mechanisms associated with reduced psychological distress. Relatively little is known about the impact of RS on genomic health issues. The objectives of our study were: (1) describe the prevalence of RS and depressive symptoms and (2) explore how RS relates to psychological distress in a cohort of individuals with a ≥25% prior probability of a genetic predisposition to cancer. Participants (n = 99) were drawn from an African‐American, Louisiana‐based kindred with a mutation at the BRCA1 locus. This analysis reports findings from a survey assessing RS and the use of three types of religious coping styles: collaborative, self‐directing, and deferring. Clinically significant depressive symptoms were relatively high (27%); with females (33%) more likely than males (17%) to report symptoms (P < 0.01). The majority of participants reported being highly religious. The most commonly employed religious problem solving style used by participants was collaborative (${\rm \bar X = 22}{\rm .9}$; SD = 5.8) versus self‐directing (${\rm \bar X = 12}{\rm .8}$; SD = 5.1) and deferring (${\rm \bar X = 19}{\rm .9}$; SD = 6.3). We did not observe significant associations between RS indicators and psychological distress, nor did we observe appreciable differences related to gender or risk perception. Although RS beliefs and practices are important for many African‐Americans, we did not find evidence that indicators of self‐reported RS are associated with psychological distress prior to genetic counseling and testing. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Journal

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part AWiley

Published: Mar 15, 2010

Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;

There are no references for this article.