Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Layton (2004)
Working Nine to Nine: The New Women of Prime TimeStudies in Gender and Sexuality, 5
J. Kovel (1980)
Narcissism and the FamilyTelos, 1980
L. Layton (1998)
Who's That Girl? Who's That Boy?: Clinical Practice Meets Postmodern Gender Theory
L. Layton (2006)
Attacks on linking: The unconscious pull to dissociate individuals from their social context.
C. Lasch (1991)
The True and Only Heaven: Progress and Its Critics
J. Benjamin (2004)
Beyond doer and done to: an intersubjective view of thirdness.The Psychoanalytic quarterly, 73 1
Rachael Peltz (2005)
The Manic SocietyPsychoanalytic Dialogues, 15
M. Klein (1946)
Notes on some schizoid mechanisms.The International journal of psycho-analysis, 27 Pt 3-4
H. Kohut (1977)
The restoration of the self
Stein Stein (2000)
Disposable youth: the 1999 Columbine High School massacre as American metaphorJournal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society, 5
Briefly Noted (2012)
What’s the Matter with Kansas?Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 41
Layton Layton (2004c)
That place gives me the heebie jeebiesInternational Journal of Critical Psychology, 10
J. Jakobsen, Ann Pellegrini (2003)
Love the Sin: Sexual Regulation and the Limits of Religious Tolerance
H. Kohut (1971)
The analysis of the self
J. Benjamin (1988)
The Bonds Of Love
O. Kernberg (1975)
Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism
D. Winnicott (1965)
The maturational processes and the facilitating environment
Long‐term and recent sociopolitical trends in the USA pull for narcissistic ways of fashioning the self and relating to others. Discourses that sustain a split between capacities for autonomy and capacities for attachment, and discourses that sustain a split between individuals and their social surround elicit omnipotent and/or submissive modes of narcissistic relating. An increasingly vulnerable and socially abandoned population, conditioned to be ashamed of its vulnerabilities and dependency, finds itself subject to discourses that pull for various splits between “us” and “them.” This situation is a breeding ground for a politics of attack, or a politics of hostile withdrawal, or both. Neoconservatism fosters a politics of attack, and liberalism fosters a politics of withdrawal. Drawing on the psychoanalytic concept of “thirdness,” the paper concludes that only discourses and institutions that foster interdependence, containment of vulnerability, and the bringing together of relational and autonomous capacities can counter retaliatory politics. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.