Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Subscribe now for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Review of rope‐based access methods for the forest canopy: safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods

Review of rope‐based access methods for the forest canopy: safe and unsafe practices in published... Summary The availability of reliable information on tree climbing methods is critical for the development of canopy science and for the safety of workers accessing the forest canopy. To assess the breadth and quality of information contained in published climbing information, we performed searches in Web of Science and Google Scholar and evaluated 54 published sources on 10 predetermined criteria related to safety. We found a high incidence of unsafe recommendations that, if followed, could result in serious injury or death. Common errors included recommendations for equipment not suitable for tree climbing, advocating methods suitable for rock climbing but that can result in falls and trauma in tree climbing, and outdated information that no longer reflects best practices. We conclude by providing safety recommendations and a short review of tree climbing methods. This article thus serves as a guide for finding and interpreting best sources of methods for canopy access. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Methods in Ecology and Evolution Wiley

Review of rope‐based access methods for the forest canopy: safe and unsafe practices in published information sources and a summary of current methods

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/review-of-rope-based-access-methods-for-the-forest-canopy-safe-and-R90LccjEdd

References (67)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 British Ecological Society
ISSN
2041-210X
eISSN
2041-210X
DOI
10.1111/2041-210X.12393
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary The availability of reliable information on tree climbing methods is critical for the development of canopy science and for the safety of workers accessing the forest canopy. To assess the breadth and quality of information contained in published climbing information, we performed searches in Web of Science and Google Scholar and evaluated 54 published sources on 10 predetermined criteria related to safety. We found a high incidence of unsafe recommendations that, if followed, could result in serious injury or death. Common errors included recommendations for equipment not suitable for tree climbing, advocating methods suitable for rock climbing but that can result in falls and trauma in tree climbing, and outdated information that no longer reflects best practices. We conclude by providing safety recommendations and a short review of tree climbing methods. This article thus serves as a guide for finding and interpreting best sources of methods for canopy access.

Journal

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionWiley

Published: Aug 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.