Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Senchack, W. Beedles (1980)
Is indirect international diversification desirable?*, 6
Wilbur Lewellen (1971)
A PURE FINANCIAL RATIONALE FOR THE CONGLOMERATE MERGERJournal of Finance, 26
Bertrand Jacquillat, Bruno Solnik (1978)
Multinationals are Poor Tools for Diversification, 4
J. Choi (1989)
Diversification, Exchange Risk and Corporate International InvestmentJournal of International Business Studies, 20
R. Ravichandran, J. Pinegar (1991)
The effect of international licensing agreements on domestic shareholder wealthThe Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2
T. Agmon, D. Lessard (1977)
Investor Recognition of Corporate International DiversificationJournal of Finance, 32
H. White (1980)
A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 48
Michael Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control UnitLSN: Law & Finance: Empirical (Topic)
E. Fama (1980)
Agency Problems and the Theory of the FirmJournal of Political Economy, 88
I. Shaked (1986)
Are Multinational Corporations Safer?Journal of International Business Studies, 17
John Hughes, D. Logue, R. Sweeney (1975)
Corporate International Diversification and Market Assigned Measures of Risk and DiversificationJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 10
J. Butler, B. Schachter (1989)
The Investment Decision: Estimation Risk and Risk Adjusted Discount RatesFinancial Management, 18
William Marshall, Jess Yawitz, E. Greenberg (1984)
Incentives for Diversification and the Structure of the Conglomerate FirmOrganizations & Markets eJournal
On average, announcements of international licensing agreements are followed by reductions in US firms' betas only for licensing agreements announced after 1980 and only for licences that transfer technology. These findings are inconsistent with an unambiguous benefit from indirect international diversification through firms. When risk does change, the change relates positively to announcement period abnormal returns for multinational corporations but not for firms going abroad for the first time. The absence of a significant relation between abnormal returns and the change in risk for first‐time entrants into international markets may be caused by small sample sizes, by extraproject information conveyed by licensing announcements made by these firms, or by potential estimation risk.
Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.