Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/tax-reform-delocation-and-heterogeneous-firms-VYB20ADST3
References (33)
-
E. Auriol, Michael Warlters (2005)
Taxation Base in Developing CountriesJournal of Public Economics, 89
-
Kind Kind, Midelfart‐Knarvik Midelfart‐Knarvik, Schjelderup Schjelderup (2000)
Competing for Capital in a Lumpy WorldJournal of Public Economics, 78
-
(2003)
Market Access, Economic Geography, and Comparative Advantage: An empirical assessment -
J. Burbidge, K. Cuff, J. Leach (2004)
Capital Tax Competition with Heterogeneous Firms and Agglomeration EffectsPublic Economics eJournal
-
K. Holland (1998)
Accounting Policy Choice: The Relationship Between Corporate Tax Burdens and Company SizeJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 25
-
Baldwin Baldwin, Okubo Okubo (2006a)
Heterogeneous Firms, Agglomeration and Economic Geography: Spatial Selection and SortingJournal of Economic Geography, 6
-
Burbidge Burbidge, Cuff Cuff, Leach Leach (2006)
Tax Competition with Heterogeneous FirmsJournal of Public Economics, 90
-
Guttorm Schjelderup, Hans Kind, K. Ulltveit-Moe (1999)
Competing for Capital in a 'Lumpy' WorldInternational Finance
-
S. Ahmed (2003)
Modelling corporate tax liabilities using company accounts : a new framework -
P. Shome (2004)
Tax Administration and the Small TaxpayerIMF Policy Discussion Papers
-
Krugman Krugman (1980)
Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of TradeAmerican Economic Review, 70
-
Andreas Haufler, Andreas Haufler, Guttorm Schjelderup (2000)
Corporate Tax Systems And Cross Country Profit Shifting, 52
-
Philippe Martin, C. Rogers (1994)
Industrial location and public infrastructureJournal of International Economics, 39
-
R. Baldwin, Toshihiro Okubo (2005)
Heterogeneous Firms, Agglomeration and Economic Geography: Spatial Selection and SortingNBER Working Paper Series
-
H. Vandenbussche, K. Crabbé, B. Janssen (2004)
Is there Regional Tax Competition? Firm Level Evidence for BelgiumDe Economist, 153
-
R. Forslid, F. Andersson (2003)
Tax Competition and Economic Geography -
Wilkie Wilkie, Limberg Limberg (1990)
The Relationship between Firm Size and Effective Tax Rate: A Reconciliation of Zimmerman and PorcanoJournal of the American Taxation Association, 11
-
Olivier Benon, Katherine Baer, Juan R. (2002)
Improving Large Taxpayers' Compliance: A Review of Country Experience -
Richard Baldwina, Paul Krugmanb (2000)
Agglomeration , integration and tax harmonisation -
(2003)
The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity -
Rodney Ludema, I. Wooton (2000)
Economic geography and the fiscal effects of regional integrationJournal of International Economics, 52
-
Paul Krugman
American Economic Association Scale Economies , Product Differentiation , and the Pattern of Trade -
R. Baldwin, P. Krugman (2000)
Agglomeration, Integration and Tax HarmonizationPublic Economics eJournal
-
Davis Davis, Weinstein Weinstein (1999)
Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical InvestigationEuropean Economic Review, 43
-
W. Clark (2003)
Using Micro-Data to Assess Average Tax RatesPublic Economics eJournal
-
R. Baldwin, Toshihiro Okubo (2006)
Agglomeration, Offshoring and Heterogenous FirmsInternational Trade
-
John Wilson (1986)
A theory of interregional tax competitionJournal of Urban Economics, 19
-
J. Zimmerman (1983)
Taxes and firm sizeJournal of Accounting and Economics, 5
-
D. Davis, David Weinstein (1997)
Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical InvestigationInternational Trade
-
(1990)
The Relationship between Firm Size and Effective Tax -
Vandenbussche Vandenbussche, Janssen Janssen, Crabbé Crabbé (2006)
Regional Tax Competition. Firm Level Evidence for BelgiumDe Economist, 153
-
K. Crabbé (2006)
Strategic Corporate Tax Competition in Italy -
A. Guimard (2008)
Competing for Capital
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © The editors of the Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2009
- ISSN
- 0347-0520
- eISSN
- 1467-9442
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2009.01582.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The standard international tax model is extended to allow for heterogeneous firms when agglomeration forces are important, enabling us to study the relocation effects of taxes that vary according to firm size. We show that allowing for heterogeneity permits a given tax scheme to have an endogenously different effect on the location decision of small and big firms, with the biggest firms being endogenously more likely to relocate in reaction to high taxes. We show that a reform that flattens the tax–firm–size profile can raise tax revenue without inducing any relocation.
Journal
The Scandinavian Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2009