Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Testing the Benefits of Public Deliberation

Testing the Benefits of Public Deliberation Public deliberation grows increasingly prevalent yet remains costly in terms of money and time. Accordingly, some suggest supplanting talk‐based practices with individual, “deliberation within.” Yet we have little evidence either way on the additional benefits of public deliberation over its individual variant. We evaluate the benefits of public deliberation with a field experiment. With the cooperation of two sitting US Senators, we recruited several hundred of their constituents to deliberate on immigration reform. Participants were randomly assigned to either deliberate publicly in an online discussion, to deliberate individually, or to an information‐only control. Across several measures, public deliberation yielded more benefits than individual deliberation. We find, moreover, little evidence to ground worries that differences in education, race, conflict avoidance, gender, or gender composition of deliberating groups will render public talk less valuable than individual deliberation. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Political Science Wiley

Testing the Benefits of Public Deliberation

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/testing-the-benefits-of-public-deliberation-xx4Va0PP6D
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2023 by the Midwest Political Science Association.
ISSN
0092-5853
eISSN
1540-5907
DOI
10.1111/ajps.12775
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Public deliberation grows increasingly prevalent yet remains costly in terms of money and time. Accordingly, some suggest supplanting talk‐based practices with individual, “deliberation within.” Yet we have little evidence either way on the additional benefits of public deliberation over its individual variant. We evaluate the benefits of public deliberation with a field experiment. With the cooperation of two sitting US Senators, we recruited several hundred of their constituents to deliberate on immigration reform. Participants were randomly assigned to either deliberate publicly in an online discussion, to deliberate individually, or to an information‐only control. Across several measures, public deliberation yielded more benefits than individual deliberation. We find, moreover, little evidence to ground worries that differences in education, race, conflict avoidance, gender, or gender composition of deliberating groups will render public talk less valuable than individual deliberation.

Journal

American Journal of Political Science – Wiley

Published: Mar 25, 2023

References

  • Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World
    Albertson, Bethany; Gadarian, Shana Kushner
  • Online Versus Face‐to‐Face Deliberation: Who? Why? What? With What Effects?”
    Baek, Young Min; Wojcieszak, Magdalena; Delli Carpini, Michael X.
  • Fitting Linear Mixed‐Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas; Mächler, Martin; Bolker, Ben; Walker, Steve
  • Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment
    Brandom, Robert.
  • Against Democracy
    Brennan, Jason.
  • Is Anxiety About Immigration a Response to Perceptions of Risk or Uncertainty?
    Bryner, S.; Devine, C.; Neblo, M.
  • The Australian Citizens’ Parliament and the Future of Deliberative Democracy
    Carson, Lyn; Gastil, John; Hartz‐Karp, Janette; Lubensky, Ron
  • Human Life Is Group Life: Deliberative Democracy for Realists
    Chambers, Simone.
  • Diversity, Institutions, and Economic Outcomes: Post‐WWII Displacement in Poland
    Charnysh, V.
  • A Spreading‐Activation Theory of Semantic Processing
    Collins, Allan M.; Loftus, Elizabeth Fee
  • Protecting Trade by Legalizing Political Disputes: Why Countries Bring Cases to the International Court of Justice
    Davis, C.L; Morse, J.C.
  • Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature
    Delli Carpini, Michael X.; Cook, Fay Lomax; Jacobs, Lawrence R.
  • The Crisis of Democracy and the Science of Deliberation
    Dryzek, John S
  • Sour Grapes
    Elster, Jon.
  • Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment with Members of Congress and Their Constituents
    Esterling, Kevin M.; Neblo, Michael A.; Lazer, David M.J.
  • When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation
    Fishkin, James S.
  • Covariate balancing propensity score for a continuous treatment: Application to the efficacy of political advertisements
    Fong, Christian; Chad, Hazlett; Kosuke, Imai
  • The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation
    Gastil, John; Deess, E. Pierre; Weiser, Philip J.; Simmons, Cindy
  • The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation
    Gastil, John.
  • Civic Awakening in the Jury Room: A Test of the Connection between Jury Deliberation and Political Participation
    Gastil, John; Deess, E. Pierre; Weiser, Phil
  • The Aims, Methods, and Effects of Deliberative Civic Education through the National Issues Forums
    Gastil, John; Dillard, James P.
  • Beyond Power Calculations: Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors
    Gelman, Andrew; Carlin, John
  • Why We (Usually) Don't Have to Worry About Multiple Comparisons
    Gelman, Andrew; Hill, Jennifer; Yajima, Masanao
  • Democratic Deliberation Within
    Goodin, Robert E
  • Reflective Democracy
    Goodin, Robert E
  • When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy
    Goodin, Robert E.; Niemeyer, Simon J.
  • What is Good Public Deliberation?
    Goold, Susan Dorr; Neblo, Michael A.; Kim, Scott Y.H.; De Vries, Raymond; Rowe, Gene; Muhlberger, Peter
  • Between Facts and Norms
    Habermas, Jurgen.
  • 1 Theory of Communicative Action
    Habermas, Jurgen.
  • An Equivalence Approach to Balance and Placebo Tests
    Hartman, Erin; Hidalgo, F. Daniel
  • Trust in Information Sources: Seeking Information from People, Documents, and Virtual Agents
    Hertzum, Morten; Andersen, Hans H.K.; Andersen, Verner; Hansen, Camilla B.
  • Assessing the difference critique of deliberation: Gender, emotion, and the jury experience
    Hickerson, Andrea; Gastil, John
  • Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data
    Honaker, James; King, Gary; Blackwell, Matthew
  • Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity
    Huddy, Leonie; Mason, Lilliana; Aarøe, Lene
  • The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions
    Karpowitz, Christopher F.; Mendelberg, Tali
  • Partisanship in a Social Setting
    Klar, Samara.
  • Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many
    Landemore, Hélène.
  • Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment
    Marcus, George E.; Neuman, W. Russell; MacKuen, Michael
  • The Poll With A Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication
    Mccombs, Maxwell; Reynolds, Amy
  • Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
    Mercier, Hugo; Landemore, Hélène
  • Field Experiment Evidence of Substantive, Attributional, and Behavioral Persuasion by Members of Congress in Online Town Halls
    Minozzi, William; Neblo, Michael A.; Esterling, Kevin M.; Lazer, David M.J.
  • Deliberation, Democratic Decision‐Making and Internal Political Efficacy
    Morrell, Michael E
  • Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy
    Mutz, Diana C
  • Interests, Information, and Minority Influence in Deliberation
    Myers, C. Daniel
  • Political Deliberation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology
    Myers, C. Daniel; Mendelberg, Tali
  • Deliberative Democracy and Citizenship: In Search of the Efficacy Effect
    Nabatchi, Tina.
  • Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice
    Neblo, Michael A
  • Impassioned Democracy: The Roles for the Emotions in Deliberative Theory
    Neblo, Michael A
  • Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy
    Neblo, Michael A.; Esterling, Kevin M.; Lazer, David M.J.
  • Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement
    Nystrand, Martin; Gamoran, Adam
  • Making the Difference: Applying a Logic of Diversity
    Page, Scott E
  • The Virtual Sphere: The internet as a Public Sphere
    Papacharissi, Zizi.
  • Can deliberative democracy work in hierarchical organizations?
    Pierce, Jason L.; Neeley, Grant; Budziak, Jeffrey
  • Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?
    Price, Vincent; Cappella, Joseph N.; Nir, Lilach
  • Against Deliberation
    Sanders, Lynn M
  • Diversity of Political Conversation on the Internet: Users’ Perspectives
    Stromer‐Galley, Jennifer.
  • On a Danger of Deliberative Democracy
    Sunstein, Cass R
  • The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter Than the Few and how Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations
    Surowiecki, James.
  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
    Taber, Charles S.; Lodge, Milton
  • There is no pill for deliberation: Explaining discourse quality in post‐conflict communities
    Ugarriza, Juan E; Nussio, Enzo
  • Conflict Avoidance and Political Participation
    Ulbig, Stacy G.; Funk, Carolyn L.
  • Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly
    Warren, Mark E.; Pearse, Hilary
  • Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?
    Wojcieszak, Magdalena E.; Mutz, Diana C.