Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Dziani Dzaha Lake: A long‐awaited modern analogue for superheavy pyrites

The Dziani Dzaha Lake: A long‐awaited modern analogue for superheavy pyrites Sedimentary records of superheavy pyrites in Phanerozoic and Proterozoic successions (i.e., extremely positive δ34Spyrite values together with higher δ34Spyrite than coeval δ34SCAS) are mostly interpreted as resulting either from secondary postdepositional processes or from multiple redox reactions between sulfate and sulfide in stratified sulfate‐poor environments. We report here the first observation of strongly positive δ34S values for both dissolved sulfate and sulfide (average δ34Sdiss.sulfate value of 34.6‰ and δ34Sdiss.sulfide values of 36.7‰) compared to the present‐day seawater δ34Sdiss.sulfate (~21‰), with a negative apparent fractionation between sulfate and sulfide (∆34Sdiss.sulfate‐diss.sulfide ~ −2.1 ± 1.4‰), in the sulfate‐poor (<3 mm) modern thalassohaline lacustrine system Dziani Dzaha (Mayotte, Indian Ocean). Overall, surface sediments faithfully record the water column isotopic signatures including a mainly negative ∆34Ssed.sulfate‐sed.sulfide (−4.98 ± 4.5‰), corresponding to the definition of superheavy pyrite documented in the rock record. We propose that in the Dziani Dzaha this superheavy pyrite signature results from a two‐stage evolution of the sulfur biogeochemical cycle. In a first stage, the sulfur cycle would have been dominated by sulfate from initially sulfate‐rich marine waters. Overtime, Raleigh distillation by microbial sulfate reduction coupled with sulfide burial in the sediment would have progressively enriched in 34S the water column residual sulfate. In a second still active stage, quantitative sulfate reduction not only occurs below the halocline during stratified periods but also in the whole water column during fully anoxic episodes. Sulfates are then regenerated by partial oxidation of sulfides as the oxic–anoxic interface moves downward. These results demonstrate that the atypical superheavy pyrite isotope signature does not necessarily require postdepositional or secondary oxidative processes and can result from primary processes in restricted sulfate‐poor and highly productive environments analogous to the Dziani Dzaha. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Geobiology Wiley

The Dziani Dzaha Lake: A long‐awaited modern analogue for superheavy pyrites

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-dziani-dzaha-lake-a-long-awaited-modern-analogue-for-superheavy-BBeRmXPSGo

References (95)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN
1472-4677
eISSN
1472-4669
DOI
10.1111/gbi.12486
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Sedimentary records of superheavy pyrites in Phanerozoic and Proterozoic successions (i.e., extremely positive δ34Spyrite values together with higher δ34Spyrite than coeval δ34SCAS) are mostly interpreted as resulting either from secondary postdepositional processes or from multiple redox reactions between sulfate and sulfide in stratified sulfate‐poor environments. We report here the first observation of strongly positive δ34S values for both dissolved sulfate and sulfide (average δ34Sdiss.sulfate value of 34.6‰ and δ34Sdiss.sulfide values of 36.7‰) compared to the present‐day seawater δ34Sdiss.sulfate (~21‰), with a negative apparent fractionation between sulfate and sulfide (∆34Sdiss.sulfate‐diss.sulfide ~ −2.1 ± 1.4‰), in the sulfate‐poor (<3 mm) modern thalassohaline lacustrine system Dziani Dzaha (Mayotte, Indian Ocean). Overall, surface sediments faithfully record the water column isotopic signatures including a mainly negative ∆34Ssed.sulfate‐sed.sulfide (−4.98 ± 4.5‰), corresponding to the definition of superheavy pyrite documented in the rock record. We propose that in the Dziani Dzaha this superheavy pyrite signature results from a two‐stage evolution of the sulfur biogeochemical cycle. In a first stage, the sulfur cycle would have been dominated by sulfate from initially sulfate‐rich marine waters. Overtime, Raleigh distillation by microbial sulfate reduction coupled with sulfide burial in the sediment would have progressively enriched in 34S the water column residual sulfate. In a second still active stage, quantitative sulfate reduction not only occurs below the halocline during stratified periods but also in the whole water column during fully anoxic episodes. Sulfates are then regenerated by partial oxidation of sulfides as the oxic–anoxic interface moves downward. These results demonstrate that the atypical superheavy pyrite isotope signature does not necessarily require postdepositional or secondary oxidative processes and can result from primary processes in restricted sulfate‐poor and highly productive environments analogous to the Dziani Dzaha.

Journal

GeobiologyWiley

Published: May 1, 2022

Keywords: microbial sulfate reduction; modern analogue; multiple sulfur isotopes; sulfide oxidation; superheavy pyrites

There are no references for this article.