Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. MacDonald, Mark Taylor (1991)
The monetary approach to the exchange rate: Long-run relationships and coefficient restrictionsEconomics Letters, 37
David Cushman (1993)
Single-equation maximum likelihood estimates of the cointegrating vector in a dollar—lira exchange rate modelApplied Economics, 25
A. Haug, R. Lucas (1996)
Long-Run Money Demand in Canada: In Search of StabilityThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 78
Allan Gregory (1994)
Testing for Cointegration in Linear Quadratic ModelsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 12
J. Stock, M. Watson (1993)
A SIMPLE ESTIMATOR OF COINTEGRATING VECTORS IN HIGHER ORDER INTEGRATED SYSTEMSEconometrica, 61
S. Johansen (1992)
Determination of Cointegration Rank in the Presence of a Linear TrendOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54
P. Phillips, S. Ouliaris (1990)
Asymptotic Properties of Residual Based Tests for CointegrationEconometrica, 58
M. Obstfeld, Kenneth Rogoff (1997)
Foundations of International Macroeconomics
R. MacDonald, Mark Taylor (1992)
The Monetary Approach to the Exchange Rate: Rational Expectations, Long-Run Equilibrium and ForecastingPolitical Economy (Topic)
Hali Edison, Joseph Gagnon, William Melick (1997)
Understanding the empirical literature on purchasing power parity: the post-Bretton Woods eraJournal of International Money and Finance, 16
D. Dickey, W. Fuller (1979)
Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit RootJournal of the American Statistical Association, 74
J. Frankel (1979)
On the Mark: A Theory of Floating Exchange Rates Based on Real Interest DifferentialsThe American Economic Review, 69
Hans-Eggert Reimers (1992)
Comparisons of tests for multivariate cointegrationStatistical Papers, 33
Michael Osterwald-Lenum (1992)
A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test StatisticsOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54
K. Juselius (1995)
DO PURCHASING POWER PARITY AND UNCOVERED INTEREST RATE PARITY HOLD IN THE LONG RUN? AN EXAMPLE OF LIKELIHOOD INFERENCE IN A MULTIVARIATE TIME-SERIES MODELJournal of Econometrics, 69
G. Schwert (1988)
Tests for Unit Roots: a Monte Carlo InvestigationEconometrics eJournal
Georgios Kouretas (1997)
Identifying Linear Restrictions on the Monetary Exchange Rate Model and the Uncovered Interest Parity: Cointegration Evidence from the Canadian-U.S. DollarCanadian Journal of Economics, 30
R. Engle, C. Granger (1987)
Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testingEconometrica, 55
S. Johansen (1991)
Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive ModelsEconometrica, 59
M. Godbout, Simon Norden (1997)
Reconsidering Cointegration in International Finance: Three Case Studies of Size Distortion in Finite SamplesEconometrics eJournal
L. Girton, Don Roper (1976)
A Monetary Model of Exchange Market Pressure Applied to the Postwar Canadian ExperienceThe American Economic Review, 67
David Cushman, Sang Lee, Thorsteinn Thorgeirsson (1996)
Maximum likelihood estimation of cointegration in exchange rate models for seven inflationary OECD countriesJournal of International Money and Finance, 15
Serena Ng, Pierre Perron (1995)
Unit Root Tests in ARMA Models with Data-Dependent Methods for the Selection of the Truncation LagJournal of the American Statistical Association, 90
Nelson Mark (1995)
Exchange Rates and Fundamentals: Evidence on Long-Horizon PredictabilityThe American Economic Review, 85
S. Said, D. Dickey (1984)
Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown orderBiometrika, 71
Robert Driskill (1981)
Exchange-Rate Dynamics: An Empirical InvestigationJournal of Political Economy, 89
G. Elliott, T. Rothenberg, J. Stock (1992)
Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit RootEconometrics eJournal
David Cushman, T. Zha (1997)
Identifying monetary policy in a small open economy under flexible exchange ratesJournal of Monetary Economics, 39
C. Sims (1980)
MACROECONOMICS AND REALITYEconometrica, 48
B. Nielsen (1995)
Bartlett correction of the unit root test in autoregressive modelsBiometrika, 84
S. Pantula, G. González-Farías, W. Fuller (1994)
A comparison of unit root test criteriaJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 12
J. Stock, M. Watson (1988)
Testing for Common TrendsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 83
Whitney Newey, K. West (1986)
A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance MatrixEconometrics eJournal
In this paper the validity of the monetary exchange rate model in the long run for the Canadian‐U.S. dollar exchange rate is examined. The primary test employed is the Johansen (1991) and Johansen and Juselius (1990) cointegration technique. The effects of dummy variables and lag specification on the statistical inference are considered, and Monte Carlo simulations based on the estimated parameters are employed. Despite the use of the longest data set yet for the Canadian case, no evidence is found in favour of the monetary exchange rate model using the Johansen procedures. This result is confirmed by several other cointegration procedures. JEL Classification: F31; F41
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'économique – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.