Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Mebane, J. Sekhon (2011)
Genetic Optimization Using Derivatives: The rgenoud Package for RJournal of Statistical Software, 42
K. Prewitt, Linda Fowler, R. Mcclure (1990)
Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress
John Friedman, Richard Holden (2009)
The Rising Incumbent Reelection Rate: What's Gerrymandering Got to Do With It?*The Journal of Politics, 71
Richard Skinner, S. Masket, D. Dulio (2012)
527 Committees and the Political Party NetworkAmerican Politics Research, 40
P. Herrnson (2009)
The Roles of Party Organizations, Party-Connected Committees, and Party Allies in ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 71
Sekhon Sekhon (2011)
Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization: The Matching Package for RJournal of Statistical Software, 42
K. Imai, D. Tingley (2011)
A Statistical Method for Empirical Testing of Competing TheoriesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 56
J. Sekhon (2008)
Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization: The Matching Package for RInformation Technology & Systems eJournal
John Aldrich (1995)
Why parties? : the origin and transformation of political parties in AmericaThe Journal of American History, 83
Casey Dominguez (2011)
Does the Party Matter? Endorsements in Congressional PrimariesPolitical Research Quarterly, 64
R. Lau, David Redlawsk (2001)
Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision MakingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 45
M. Fiorina, S. Abrams, J. Pope (2004)
Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America
M. Newman (2006)
Modularity and community structure in networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103 23
David Konisky, Christopher Reenock (2012)
Case Selection in Public Management Research: Problems and Solutions
P. Herrnson (1995)
Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington
L. Maisel, W. Stone (1997)
Determinants of Candidate Emergence in U. S. House Elections: An Exploratory StudyLegislative Studies Quarterly, 22
G. Jacobson (1983)
The Politics of Congressional Elections
Skinner Skinner (2005)
Do 527's Add Up to a Party? Thinking about the ?Shadows? of PoliticsThe Forum, 3
C. Fraley, A. Raftery (1998)
How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-Based Cluster AnalysisComput. J., 41
Matt Grossmann (2012)
The Not-So-Special Interests: Interest Groups, Public Representation, and American Governance
S. Levitt, Catherine Wolfram (1997)
Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U. S. HouseLegislative Studies Quarterly, 22
Kolodny Kolodny, Dwyre Dwyre (1998)
Party?Orchestrated Activities for Legislative Party Goals: Campaigns for Majorities in the US House of Representatives in the 1990sParty Politics, 4
Gregory Koger, S. Masket, Hans Noel (2010)
Cooperative Party Factions in American PoliticsAmerican Politics Research, 38
Matthias Bernhardt, Daniel Ingerman (1985)
Candidate reputations and the 'incumbency effect'Journal of Public Economics, 27
J. Lazarus (2008)
Incumbent Vulnerability and Challenger Entry in Statewide ElectionsAmerican Politics Research, 36
M. Heaney, S. Masket, Joanne Miller, Dara Strolovitch (2012)
Polarized NetworksAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 56
A. Lupia (1994)
Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 88
David Jones (2010)
Partisan Polarization and Congressional Accountability in House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 54
S. Iacus, Gary King, G. Porro (2012)
Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact MatchingPolitical Analysis, 20
Jonathan Woon, J. Pope (2008)
Made in Congress? Testing the Electoral Implications of Party Ideological Brand NamesThe Journal of Politics, 70
A. Abramowitz, B. Alexander, Matthew Gunning (2006)
Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 68
Jamie Carson, Michael Crespin, Carrie Eaves, Emily Wanless (2012)
Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in Primary Elections for the U.S. HouseState Politics & Policy Quarterly, 12
G. Jacobson (1989)
Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86American Political Science Review, 83
Adam Bonica (2013)
Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace: IDEOLOGY AND INTERESTS IN THE POLITICAL MARKETPLACEAmerican Journal of Political Science, 57
G. Cox, Mathew McCubbins (1993)
Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House
Matt Grossmann, Casey Dominguez (2009)
Party Coalitions and Interest Group NetworksAmerican Politics Research, 37
B. Alexander (2005)
Good Money and Bad Money: Do Funding Sources Affect Electoral Outcomes?Political Research Quarterly (formerly WPQ), 58
Thomas Wood (1950)
SOUTHERN POLITICS IN STATE AND NATION. By V. O. Key, Jr. with Alexander Heard. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1949.University of Miami law review, 4
M. Newman (2010)
Networks: An Introduction
Gregory Koger, S. Masket, Hans Noel (2009)
Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party NetworksBritish Journal of Political Science, 39
J. Friedman, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani (2010)
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.Journal of statistical software, 33 1
Michael Franz (2011)
The Citizens United Election? Or Same As It Ever Was?The Forum, 8
Heaney Heaney, Masket Masket, Miller Miller, Strolovitch Strolovitch (2012)
Polarized Networks: The Organizational Affiliations of National Party Convention DelegatesAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 56
P. Herrnson (1989)
Party campaigning in the 1980s
R. Tibshirani (1996)
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the LassoJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 58
R. Kolodny, D. Dwyre (1998)
Party-Orchestrated Activities for Legislative Party GoalsParty Politics, 4
Thomas Fruchterman, E. Reingold (1991)
Graph drawing by force‐directed placementSoftware: Practice and Experience, 21
S. Masket (2009)
No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures
Kevin Arceneaux, R. Kolodny (2009)
Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots CampaignAmerican Journal of Political Science, 53
Kathleen Bawn, Martin Cohen, David Karol, S. Masket, Hans Noel, J. Zaller (2012)
A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American PoliticsPerspectives on Politics, 10
Adam Bonica (2012)
Ideology and Interests in the Political MarketplaceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 57
Marty Cohen, David Karol, Hans Noel, J. Zaller (2008)
The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform
R. Tibshirani (2011)
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospectiveJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 73
David Mayhew (1975)
Congress: The Electoral Connection
Richard Fenno (1978)
Home Style : House Members in Their Districts
Michael Dreiling, Derek Darves (2011)
Corporate Unity in American Trade Policy: A Network Analysis of Corporate-Dyad Political ActionAmerican Journal of Sociology, 116
Brandice Canes-Wrone, D. Brady, J. Cogan (2002)
Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' VotingAmerican Political Science Review, 96
Extended party network (EPN) theory characterizes political parties in the United States as dynamic networks of interest groups that collaboratively support favored candidates for office. Electoral predictions derived from EPN theory have yet to be tested on a large sample of races. We operationalize EPNs in the context of organized interest contributions to U.S. House campaigns. We deduce that support by a partisan community of interests signals the ideological credibility and appeal of a candidate. EPN integration overcomes voter ambiguity surrounding challengers’ ideological preferences, and resources provided by these coordinating interest groups promote a consistent message about the candidate. Using data from the 1994–2010 cycles, we apply network analysis to detect EPN support of challengers and find that EPN integration substantially improves the electoral prospects of challengers. The effect of EPN integration is distinct from that of campaign resources. The findings provide support for EPN theory, as applied to congressional elections.
American Journal of Political Science – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.