Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The impact of robotic‐assisted transperineal biopsy of the prostate on erectile function

The impact of robotic‐assisted transperineal biopsy of the prostate on erectile function INTRODUCTIONWorldwide prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignant disease in men and its histological confirmation by biopsy remains essential for therapy decisions.1 Different approaches and techniques have been described2 and alone in Europe and the United States more than 2 million procedures are carried out every year. This high frequency presupposes a precise knowledge of possible complications to facilitate selection of an appropriate biopsy method.3 Especially extensive or repeated biopsies may lead to a decrease of erectile function (EF) attributable to the acute healing phase after the procedure or anxiety related to a possible cancer diagnosis.4,5 These impacts of either TRUS‐guided transrectal (TRBx) or perineal biopsies (TPBx) have been assessed by some authors,5–9 but the data are sparse and heterogenous and there is a lack of information for newly introduced minimal invasive approaches.4,9Male erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as a persistent inability to attain and maintain an erection sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual performance.10 For assessment of ED severity, the International Index of Erectile Function‐5 (IIEF‐5) questionnaire is in regular use.5 Significant decrease of IIEF‐5 1 month after biopsy was demonstrated for both, TRBx and TPBx,9 however technique or number of biopsy cores showed no significant impact http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Andrology Wiley

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-impact-of-robotic-assisted-transperineal-biopsy-of-the-prostate-on-XwH8QtkP3o
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.
ISSN
2047-2919
eISSN
2047-2927
DOI
10.1111/andr.13346
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONWorldwide prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignant disease in men and its histological confirmation by biopsy remains essential for therapy decisions.1 Different approaches and techniques have been described2 and alone in Europe and the United States more than 2 million procedures are carried out every year. This high frequency presupposes a precise knowledge of possible complications to facilitate selection of an appropriate biopsy method.3 Especially extensive or repeated biopsies may lead to a decrease of erectile function (EF) attributable to the acute healing phase after the procedure or anxiety related to a possible cancer diagnosis.4,5 These impacts of either TRUS‐guided transrectal (TRBx) or perineal biopsies (TPBx) have been assessed by some authors,5–9 but the data are sparse and heterogenous and there is a lack of information for newly introduced minimal invasive approaches.4,9Male erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as a persistent inability to attain and maintain an erection sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual performance.10 For assessment of ED severity, the International Index of Erectile Function‐5 (IIEF‐5) questionnaire is in regular use.5 Significant decrease of IIEF‐5 1 month after biopsy was demonstrated for both, TRBx and TPBx,9 however technique or number of biopsy cores showed no significant impact

Journal

AndrologyWiley

Published: Sep 1, 2023

Keywords: erectile dysfunction; erectile function; minimal‐invasive; prostate biopsy; robotic‐assisted; transperineal

References