Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Impact of Social Segregation on the Labor Market Outcomes of Low‐Skilled Workers

The Impact of Social Segregation on the Labor Market Outcomes of Low‐Skilled Workers We study the impact of network homophily on labor market outcomes in a search‐and‐matching model with two job search channels: the formal market and social contacts. There are two worker types: low‐skilled and high‐skilled workers. The homophily level determines whether the referral networks of the two types are mixed or segregated from each other. We show that there exists an intermediate homophily level that minimizes the unemployment rate and maximizes the wages of low‐skilled workers. Complete integration does not maximize the welfare of low‐skilled workers, unless it improves their productivity. We argue that our model can explain the empirical findings on the labor market effects of the Moving‐to‐Opportunity experiment and the integration of immigrants. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Scandinavian Journal of Economics Wiley

The Impact of Social Segregation on the Labor Market Outcomes of Low‐Skilled Workers

The Scandinavian Journal of Economics , Volume 122 (1) – Jan 1, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-impact-of-social-segregation-on-the-labor-market-outcomes-of-low-lEVn4GftTB

References (55)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2019 The editors of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics.
ISSN
0347-0520
eISSN
1467-9442
DOI
10.1111/sjoe.12324
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We study the impact of network homophily on labor market outcomes in a search‐and‐matching model with two job search channels: the formal market and social contacts. There are two worker types: low‐skilled and high‐skilled workers. The homophily level determines whether the referral networks of the two types are mixed or segregated from each other. We show that there exists an intermediate homophily level that minimizes the unemployment rate and maximizes the wages of low‐skilled workers. Complete integration does not maximize the welfare of low‐skilled workers, unless it improves their productivity. We argue that our model can explain the empirical findings on the labor market effects of the Moving‐to‐Opportunity experiment and the integration of immigrants.

Journal

The Scandinavian Journal of EconomicsWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2020

Keywords: ; ; ; ;

There are no references for this article.