Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/the-meaning-of-intimacy-logic-and-methods-Iu3jBkTjLt
References (7)
-
Doyle Doyle, Molix Molix (2015)
Social stigma and sexual minorities? romantic relationship functioning: A meta?analytic reviewPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41
-
D. Frost, K. Gola (2015)
Meanings of Intimacy: A Comparison of Members of Heterosexual and Same‐Sex CouplesAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15
-
D. Doyle, Lisa Molix (2015)
Social Stigma and Sexual Minorities’ Romantic Relationship FunctioningPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41
-
D. Streiner (2003)
Unicorns Do Exist: A Tutorial on “Proving” the Null HypothesisThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48
-
B. Fehr (1988)
Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitmentJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55
-
Benjamin Le, C. Agnew (2003)
Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta–analysis of the Investment ModelPersonal Relationships, 10
-
R. Schoot, P. Lugtig, J. Hox (2012)
A checklist for testing measurement invarianceEuropean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © 2015 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
- ISSN
- 1529-7489
- eISSN
- 1530-2415
- DOI
- 10.1111/asap.12090
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This commentary on Frost and Gola's (2015) article first identifies strengths of their article. It then discusses two directions along which their original work might be expanded: (i) the logic of the argument and (ii) the type of data collected.
Journal
Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2015