Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/the-meaning-of-intimacy-post-obergefell-implications-jYzy0fslyL
References (9)
-
D. Sherkat, K. Vries, Stacia Creek (2010)
Race, Religion, and Opposition to Same‐Sex MarriageSocial Science Quarterly, 91
-
D. Frost, K. Gola (2015)
Meanings of Intimacy: A Comparison of Members of Heterosexual and Same‐Sex CouplesAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15
-
C. Franklin, L. Kosaki (1989)
Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and AbortionAmerican Political Science Review, 83
-
D. Frost, S. Ouellette (2011)
A Search for Meaning: Recognizing the Potential of Narrative Research in Social Policy-Making EffortsSexuality Research and Social Policy, 8
-
Valerie Hoekstra, J. Segal (1996)
The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's ChapelThe Journal of Politics, 58
-
E. Rothblum, Kimberly Balsam, S. Solomon (2011)
Narratives of Same-Sex Couples Who Had Civil Unions in Vermont: The Impact of Legalizing Relationships on Couples and on Social PolicySexuality Research and Social Policy, 8
-
G. Herek (2006)
Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: a social science perspective.The American psychologist, 61 6
-
J. MDiv, J. Brown, Lorna Hochstein (1989)
Institutional Religion and Gay/Lesbian OppressionMarriage and Family Review, 14
-
T. Johnson, Andrew Martin (1998)
The Public's Conditional Response to Supreme Court DecisionsAmerican Political Science Review, 92
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © 2015 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
- ISSN
- 1529-7489
- eISSN
- 1530-2415
- DOI
- 10.1111/asap.12086
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This commentary on Frost and Gola's (2015) article expands on the discussion of the policy and practical implications of their findings. Specifically, we highlight the potential impact of the Supreme Court's decision from the positive response hypothesis and the more probable structural response hypothesis (i.e., that the decision will serve to polarize attitudes).
Journal
Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2015