Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Neoarchaean surficial sulphur cycle: An alternative hypothesis based on analogies with 20th‐century atmospheric lead

The Neoarchaean surficial sulphur cycle: An alternative hypothesis based on analogies with... We revisit the S‐isotope systematics of sedimentary pyrite in a shaly limestone from the ca. 2.52 Ga Gamohaan Formation, Upper Campbellrand Subgroup, Transvaal, South Africa. The analysed rock is interpreted to have been deposited in a water depth of ca. 50–100 m, in a restricted sub‐basin on a drowning platform. A previous study discovered that the pyrites define a nonzero intercept δ34SV‐CDT–Δ33S data array. The present study carried out further quadruple S‐isotope analyses of pyrite, confirming and expanding the linear δ34SV‐CDT–Δ33S array with an δ34S zero intercept at ∆33S ca. +5. This was previously interpreted to indicate mixing of unrelated S‐sources in the sediment environment, involving a combination of recycled sulphur from sulphides that had originally formed by sulphate‐reducing bacteria, along with elemental sulphur. Here, we advance an alternative explanation based on the recognition that the Archaean seawater sulphate concentration was likely very low, implying that the Archaean ocean could have been poorly mixed with respect to sulphur. Thus, modern oceanic sulphur systematics provide limited insight into the Archaean sulphur cycle. Instead, we propose that the 20th‐century atmospheric lead event may be a useful analogue. Similar to industrial lead, the main oceanic input of Archaean sulphur was through atmospheric raindown, with individual giant point sources capable of temporally dominating atmospheric input. Local atmospheric S‐isotope signals, of no global significance, could thus have been transmitted into the localised sediment record. Thus, the nonzero intercept δ34SV‐CDT–Δ33S data array may alternatively represent a very localised S‐isotope signature in the Neoarchaean surface environment. Fallout from local volcanic eruptions could imprint recycled MIF‐S signals into pyrite of restricted depositional environments, thereby avoiding attenuation of the signal in the subdued, averaged global open ocean sulphur pool. Thus, the superposition of extreme local S‐isotope signals offers an alternative explanation for the large Neoarchaean MIF‐S excursions and asymmetry of the Δ33S rock record. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Geobiology Wiley

The Neoarchaean surficial sulphur cycle: An alternative hypothesis based on analogies with 20th‐century atmospheric lead

Gallagher, M.; Whitehouse, M. J.; Kamber, B. S.
Geobiology , Volume 15 (3) – May 1, 2017
Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-neoarchaean-surficial-sulphur-cycle-an-alternative-hypothesis-GYqZoYyj05

References (166)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN
1472-4677
eISSN
1472-4669
DOI
10.1111/gbi.12234
pmid
28299862
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We revisit the S‐isotope systematics of sedimentary pyrite in a shaly limestone from the ca. 2.52 Ga Gamohaan Formation, Upper Campbellrand Subgroup, Transvaal, South Africa. The analysed rock is interpreted to have been deposited in a water depth of ca. 50–100 m, in a restricted sub‐basin on a drowning platform. A previous study discovered that the pyrites define a nonzero intercept δ34SV‐CDT–Δ33S data array. The present study carried out further quadruple S‐isotope analyses of pyrite, confirming and expanding the linear δ34SV‐CDT–Δ33S array with an δ34S zero intercept at ∆33S ca. +5. This was previously interpreted to indicate mixing of unrelated S‐sources in the sediment environment, involving a combination of recycled sulphur from sulphides that had originally formed by sulphate‐reducing bacteria, along with elemental sulphur. Here, we advance an alternative explanation based on the recognition that the Archaean seawater sulphate concentration was likely very low, implying that the Archaean ocean could have been poorly mixed with respect to sulphur. Thus, modern oceanic sulphur systematics provide limited insight into the Archaean sulphur cycle. Instead, we propose that the 20th‐century atmospheric lead event may be a useful analogue. Similar to industrial lead, the main oceanic input of Archaean sulphur was through atmospheric raindown, with individual giant point sources capable of temporally dominating atmospheric input. Local atmospheric S‐isotope signals, of no global significance, could thus have been transmitted into the localised sediment record. Thus, the nonzero intercept δ34SV‐CDT–Δ33S data array may alternatively represent a very localised S‐isotope signature in the Neoarchaean surface environment. Fallout from local volcanic eruptions could imprint recycled MIF‐S signals into pyrite of restricted depositional environments, thereby avoiding attenuation of the signal in the subdued, averaged global open ocean sulphur pool. Thus, the superposition of extreme local S‐isotope signals offers an alternative explanation for the large Neoarchaean MIF‐S excursions and asymmetry of the Δ33S rock record.

Journal

Geobiology – Wiley

Published: May 1, 2017

There are no references for this article.