Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Zheng Wen, D. O'Neill, H. Maei (2014)
Optimal Demand Response Using Device-Based Reinforcement LearningIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6
(2013)
Decision making under uncertainty in energy systems: State of the art. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
(2015)
Smart grid traffic light concept
B. Kladnik, A. Gubina, G. Artac, K. Nagode, I. Kockar (2011)
Agent-based modeling of the demand-side flexibility2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting
M. Braun, T. Stetz, R. Bründlinger, C. Mayr, K. Ogimoto, H. Hatta, Hiromu Kobayashi, B. Kroposki, B. Mather, M. Coddington, K. Lynn, G. Graditi, A. Woyte, I. MacGill (2012)
Is the distribution grid ready to accept large‐scale photovoltaic deployment? State of the art, progress, and future prospectsProgress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 20
L. Kaelbling, M. Littman, A. Moore (1996)
Reinforcement Learning: A SurveyJ. Artif. Intell. Res., 4
A. Weidlich, Daniel Veit (2008)
A Critical Survey of Agent-Based Wholesale Electricity Market ModelsSRPN: Other Built Environment (Topic)
M. Brown, Shan Zhou (2013)
Smart‐grid policies: an international reviewWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 2
N. Mahmoudi, E. Heydarian‐Forushani, M. Shafie‐khah, T. Saha, M. Golshan, P. Siano (2017)
A bottom-up approach for demand response aggregators’ participation in electricity marketsElectric Power Systems Research, 143
B. Kladnik, G. Artac, Tomaz Stokelj, Robert Golob, Andrej, Gubina (2012)
Demand-side participation in system reserve provision in a stochastic market model with high wind penetration2012 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON)
Gašper Arta, Damian Flynn, B. Kladnik, M. Hajdinjak, Andrej Gubina (2012)
The flexible demand influence on the joint energy and reserve markets2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting
Volodymyr Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Alex Graves, Ioannis Antonoglou, Daan Wierstra, Martin Riedmiller (2013)
Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement LearningArXiv, abs/1312.5602
A. Tuohy, Ben Kaun, R. Entriken (2019)
Storage and demand‐side options for integrating wind powerWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 3
Philipp Ringler, D. Keles, W. Fichtner (2016)
Agent-based modelling and simulation of smart electricity grids and markets – A literature reviewRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57
M. Galus, Marina Vaya, T. Krause, G. Andersson (2013)
The role of electric vehicles in smart gridsWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 2
tiko-with more than 6500 houses connected, the energy revolution has started!
F. Pilo, G. Celli, E. Ghiani, G. Soma (2013)
New electricity distribution network planning approaches for integrating renewableWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 2
K. Mehmood, S. Khan, Soon-Jeong Lee, Z. Haider, M. Rafique, Chul-Hwan Kim (2018)
A real-time optimal coordination scheme for the voltage regulation of a distribution network including an OLTC, capacitor banks, and multiple distributed energy resourcesInternational Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 94
G. Artac, D. Flynn, B. Kladnik, M. Pantoš, A. Gubina, R. Golob (2013)
A new method for determining the demand reserve offer functionElectric Power Systems Research, 100
(2014)
Network and information security (NIS): Recommendations for information sharing and risk management
Alireza Soroudi, T. Amraee (2013)
Decision making under uncertainty in energy systems: state of the artArXiv, abs/1911.10905
(2015)
How to cite this article: Medved T, Arta c G, Gubina AF. The use of intelligent aggregator agents for advanced control of demand response
M. Vallés, J. Reneses, P. Frías, C. Mateo (2016)
Economic benefits of integrating Active Demand in distribution network planning: A Spanish case studyElectric Power Systems Research, 136
T. Medved, B. Prislan, J. Zupancic, A. Gubina (2016)
A traffic light system for enhancing the utilization of demand response in LV distribution networks2016 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe)
M. Babar, P. Nguyen, V. Ćuk, I. Kamphuis, M. Bongaerts, Z. Hanzelka (2018)
The Evaluation of Agile Demand Response: An Applied MethodologyIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9
Lei Yang, Z. Nagy, P. Goffin, A. Schlueter (2015)
Reinforcement learning for optimal control of low exergy buildingsApplied Energy, 156
S. Kiliccote, D. Olsen, M. Sohn, M. Piette (2016)
Characterization of demand response in the commercial, industrial, and residential sectors in the United StatesWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 5
With the integration of distributed renewable energy sources (DRES) and active demand (e.g., units providing demand response, DR) in the distribution grid, the importance of monitoring the network conditions, managing the line congestions and observing the voltage levels is increasing. The distribution system operator (DSO) needs a mechanism, such as the traffic light system, to screen and approve the proposed operation schedules of the flexible active resources in the distribution grid. Their aggregated control will require the aggregators to employ advanced scheduling algorithms. The DR scheduling algorithms can be set to pursue various goals, for example, maximization of profit or cost reduction, grid support, or provision of the ancillary services. In the paper, we present a new DR scheduling approach suitable for the aggregation agent using approximate Q‐learning (AQL) algorithm scheduling. We present the AQL algorithm and the associated assumptions used in simulations on a real‐world low‐voltage (LV) grid model, comparing the AQL approach results to those of the economic scheduling and the energy scheduling approaches. Our assumption was that the AQL approach could outperform the energy or economic approaches as the AQL agent would be able to learn to avoid the scheduling penalties. The results of our research show that the aggregator agent using the economic approach shows the best economic performance, but causes the most schedule violations. The energy scheduling approach improves the network voltage profile but lowers the aggregator's profit. The AQL approach results in the agent's economic performance between the former two approaches with minimal schedule violations, confirming our research hypothesis.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.