Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Bernard, S. Gervais, Jill Allen, Sophie Campomizzi, O. Klein (2012)
Integrating Sexual Objectification With Object Versus Person RecognitionPsychological Science, 23
Christine Logel, G. Walton, S. Spencer, E. Iserman, William Hippel, Amy Bell (2009)
Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers.Journal of personality and social psychology, 96 6
J. Kilbourne (1994)
Still killing us softly: Advertising and the obsession with thinness.
G. Fair (1999)
Sex and Social JusticeSocial Theory and Practice, 25
S. Thornham (2015)
On “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”Feminist Media Studies, 15
B. Fredrickson, Tom Roberts (1997)
Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health RisksPsychology of Women Quarterly, 21
Nathan Heflick, J. Goldenberg (2009)
Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully humanJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45
Nathan Heflick, J. Goldenberg, Douglas Cooper, E. Puvia (2011)
From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competenceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47
V. Swami, Rebecca Coles, Karolina Wyrozumska, E. Wilson, Natalie Salem, A. Furnham (2010)
Oppressive Beliefs at Play: Associations among Beauty Ideals and Practices and Individual Differences in Sexism, Objectification of Others, and Media ExposurePsychology of Women Quarterly, 34
L. Ward, Kristen Harrison (2005)
The Impact of Media Use on Girls' Beliefs About Gender Roles, Their Bodies, and Sexual Relationships: A Research Synthesis.
Harris Harris, Fiske Fiske (2006)
Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out‐groupsPsychological Science, 17
J. Vaes, Paola Paladino, E. Puvia (2011)
Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified womenEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 41
S. Fiske, Amy Cuddy, P. Glick (2007)
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competenceTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 11
Bernard Bernard, Gervais Gervais, Allen Allen, Campomizzi Campomizzi, Klein Klein (2012)
Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized‐body‐inversion hypothesisPsychological Science, 23
E. Daniels, Heidi Wartena (2011)
Athlete or Sex Symbol: What Boys Think of Media Representations of Female AthletesSex Roles, 65
L. Harris, S. Fiske (2006)
Dehumanizing the Lowest of the LowPsychological Science, 17
Bertram Gawronski, G. Bodenhausen (2006)
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.Psychological bulletin, 132 5
M. Liss, Mindy Erchull, Laura Ramsey (2011)
Empowering or Oppressing? Development and Exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization ScalePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37
W. Kilbourne (1990)
Female Stereotyping in Advertising: An Experiment on Male-Female Perceptions of LeadershipJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 67
E. Daniels (2009)
Sex Objects, Athletes, and Sexy AthletesJournal of Adolescent Research, 24
Sue Lafky, Margaret Duffy, Mary Steinmaus, Dan Berkowitz (1996)
Looking through Gendered Lenses: Female Stereotyping in Advertisements and Gender Role ExpectationsJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73
S. Loughnan, N. Haslam, T. Murnane, J. Vaes, Catherine Reynolds, Caterina Suitner (2010)
Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified othersEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 40
N. Dasgupta, A. Greenwald (2001)
On the malleability of automatic attitudes: combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals.Journal of personality and social psychology, 81 5
E. Daniels (2012)
Sexy versus Strong: What Girls and Women Think of Female Athletes.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33
N. Schwarz, E. Kurz (1989)
What's in a picture? The impact of face‐ism on trait attributionEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 19
M. Cikara, J. Eberhardt, S. Fiske (2011)
From Agents to Objects: Sexist Attitudes and Neural Responses to Sexualized TargetsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23
W. Hippel, Denise Sekaquaptewa, Patrick Vargas (1997)
The Linguistic Intergroup Bias As an Implicit Indicator of PrejudiceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33
S. Bartky (1990)
Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
Daniels Daniels (2009)
Sex objects, athletes, and sexy athletes: How media representations of women athletes can impact adolescent girls and young womenJournal of Adolescent Research, 24
S. Fiske, Amy Cuddy, P. Glick, Jun Xu (2002)
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.Journal of personality and social psychology, 82 6
Laurie Rudman, E. Borgida (1995)
The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objectsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31
D. Archer, B. Iritani, Debra Kimes, M. Barrios (1983)
Face-ism: Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45
Pam Flaskrud, Kari Dietzler, Ingrid Niehans, J. Jenkins, M. McClellan, David Rivas, A. Cobb, Richard Silva, J. Honikman, R. Grace, Amanda Casarjian, S. Lemon, D. Goldstein, Maria Wilson, Lauren Yurfest (2001)
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
Previous research has documented negative effects of exposure to sexually objectifying media and positive effects of viewing women with more power and agency. The current study evaluates the effects of pairing these two types of representations of women on gender attitudes. Experimental stimuli were based on actual images from a student newspaper, where a statement from the new, female university president ran on the front page adjacent to a sexually objectifying ad. The experiment used a 2 (type of article) X 2 (type of ad) X 2 (gender) design to evaluate the independent and combined effects of viewing the statement from the president and the objectifying ad. Exposure to the objectifying ad was related to more attributional bias and marginally more stereotype production but was not related to hostile or benevolent sexism. Men who saw the objectifying ad alongside the president's statement rated the president as significantly less competent than other groups. Implications for the professional advancement of women are discussed, including the importance of context for media attention paid to female political figures.
Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.