Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Andrew Penner, Aliya Saperstein (2008)
How social status shapes raceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105
A. Hayes (2012)
PROCESS : A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation , Moderation , and Conditional Process Modeling 1
Kerri Johnson, J. Freeman, Kristin Pauker (2012)
Race is gendered: how covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization.Journal of personality and social psychology, 102 1
Cynthia Esqueda, Russ Espinoza, Scott Culhane (2008)
The Effects of Ethnicity, SES, and Crime Status on Juror Decision MakingHispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30
N. Ghavami, L. A. Peplau (2012)
An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses, 37
C. Steele, Joshua Aronson (1995)
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.Journal of personality and social psychology, 69 5
Leigh Wilton, D. Sanchez, George Chavez (2013)
Speaking the Language of Diversity: Spanish Fluency, White Ancestry, and Skin Color in the Distribution of Diversity Awards to LatinosBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 35
J. Freeman, Andrew Penner, Aliya Saperstein, Matthias Scheutz, N. Ambady (2011)
Looking the Part: Social Status Cues Shape Race PerceptionPLoS ONE, 6
R. R. Banks, J. L. Eberhardt (1998)
Confronting racism: The problem and the response
D. T. Sanchez, J. A. Garcia (2012)
Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction
W. Darity, A. Deshpande, T. Weisskopf (2011)
Who Is Eligible? Should Affirmative Action be Group- or Class-Based?The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70
(2012)
Celebrated Latino hire not bilingual
Danielle Young, D. Sanchez, Leigh Wilton (2013)
At the crossroads of race: racial ambiguity and biracial identification influence psychological essentialist thinking.Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology, 19 4
David Kravitz, J. Platania (1993)
Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicityJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
D. Sanchez, M. Shih, Leigh Wilton (2014)
Exploring the Identity Autonomy Perspective (IAP)
(2009)
Hypodescent in Reflexive Categorization of Racially Ambiguous Faces
F. Crosby, Aarti Iyer, S. Clayton, R. Downing (2003)
Affirmative action. Psychological data and the policy debates.The American psychologist, 58 2
H. Haley, J. Sidanius (2006)
The Positive and Negative Framing of Affirmative Action: A Group Dominance PerspectivePersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32
A. Liptak (2014)
Court backs Michigan on affirmative action
H. Markus, P. Moya (2010)
Doing race : 21 essays for the 21st century
P. Goff, Margaret Thomas, M. Jackson (2008)
“Ain’t I a Woman?”: Towards an Intersectional Approach to Person Perception and Group-based HarmsSex Roles, 59
D. Oppenheimer (1995)
Understanding Affirmative ActionHastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 23
D. Harrison, David Kravitz, David Mayer, Lisa Leslie, Dalit Lev-Arey (2006)
Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research.The Journal of applied psychology, 91 5
Edward Telles (2002)
Racial ambiguity among the Brazilian populationEthnic and Racial Studies, 25
S. Fiske, Amy Cuddy, P. Glick, Jun Xu (2002)
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.Journal of personality and social psychology, 82 6
(2012)
Poverty and health: The mediating role of perceived discrimination
Jessica Good, D. Sanchez, George Chavez (2013)
White ancestry in perceptions of Black/White biracial individuals: implications for affirmative‐action contextsJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 43
Sarah Johnson, J. Richeson, E. Finkel (2011)
Middle class and marginal? Socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university.Journal of personality and social psychology, 100 5
Cheryl Kaiser, Benjamin Drury, Kerry Spalding, S. Cheryan, Laurie O’Brien (2009)
The ironic consequences of Obama's election: Decreased support for social justiceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45
(2012)
Putting race in context: Socioeconomic status predicts racial fluidity
(1996)
Affirmative action: Who benefits?
Negin Ghavami, L. Peplau (2013)
An Intersectional Analysis of Gender and Ethnic StereotypesPsychology of Women Quarterly, 37
D. Sanchez, Jessica Good, George Chavez (2011)
Blood Quantum and Perceptions of Black-White Biracial Targets: The Black Ancestry Prototype Model of Affirmative ActionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37
D. Sanchez, George Chavez (2010)
Are You Minority Enough? Language Ability Affects Targets' and Perceivers' Assessments of a Candidate's Appropriateness for Affirmative ActionBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 32
R. Sander (1997)
Experimenting with class‐based affirmative action, 47
A. Hayes (2009)
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New MillenniumCommunication Monographs, 76
K. Rockquemore, D. Brunsma (2002)
Socially Embedded Identities: Theories, Typologies, and Processes of Racial Identity among Black/White BiracialsThe Sociological Quarterly, 43
Matthew Weeks, M. Lupfer
Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Complicating Race: the Relationship between Prejudice, Race, and Social Class Categorizations on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology
A. F. Hayes (2012)
PROCESS
Arnold Ho, J. Sidanius, Amy Cuddy, M. Banaji (2013)
Status boundary enforcement and the categorization of black–white biracialsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49
Sarah Townsend, Stephanie Fryberg, Clara Wilkins, H. Markus (2012)
Being mixed: who claims a biracial identity?Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology, 18 1
Arnold Ho, J. Sidanius, D. Levin, M. Banaji (2011)
Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals.Journal of personality and social psychology, 100 3
D. Sanchez, Courtney Bonam (2009)
To Disclose or Not to Disclose Biracial Identity: The Effect of Biracial Disclosure on Perceiver Evaluations and Target ResponsesJournal of Social Issues, 65
F. Crosby, S. Clayton (2001)
Affirmative Action: Psychological Contributions to PolicyAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 1
D. Peery, G. V. Bodenhausen (2008)
Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces, 19
C. W. Esqueda, R. K. E. Espinoza, S. E. Culhane (2008)
The effects of ethnicity, SES, and crime status on juror decision making: A cross‐cultural examination of Euopean American and Mexican American mock jurors, 30
S. Gaither, Leigh Wilton, Danielle Young (2014)
Perceiving a Presidency in Black (and White): Four Years LaterAnalyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14
(1998)
Social psychological processes and the legal bases of racial categorization
Colleen Carpinella, Jacqueline Chen, D. Hamilton, Kerri Johnson (2015)
Gendered Facial Cues Influence Race CategorizationsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41
D. T. Sanchez, M. J. Shih, L. S. Wilton (2014)
The Oxford Handbook on Multicultural Identity
M. Weeks, M. B. Lupfer (2004)
Complicating race: The relationship between prejudice, race, and social class categorizations, 30
Understanding racial categorization processes has implications for how affirmative action policies are implemented. Two studies examined how socioeconomic status (SES) functions to predict support for application of affirmative action and other perceptions of Latino targets. SES emerged as a powerful predictor, over and above the influence of ancestry, on person perception (minority categorization, sociocultural cues) and support for affirmative action among both White (Studies 1 and 2) and minority (Study 2) perceivers. In conjunction with ancestry, SES influenced sociocultural impressions, such as perceptions of discrimination (Study 1 and Study 2) and cultural practices (Study 2), which informed support for implementation of affirmative action policies. Furthermore, the joint influence of SES and ancestry on affirmative action policies persisted even when controlling for general attitudes towards affirmative action (Study 2). Results suggest that SES is an important factor in person perception, and that perceptions of discrimination play a strong role in how “deserving” a target is of affirmative action.
Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.