Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Towards a Solution to the Variety in Accounting Practices of Extractive Firms under IFRS

Towards a Solution to the Variety in Accounting Practices of Extractive Firms under IFRS Accounting for exploration and evaluation (E&E) costs is one of the last major issues to remain largely unregulated by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), even though extractive firms are an important part of several big stock markets. Under a temporary permissive standard (IFRS 6), which has been in place since 2004, firms use a wide range of accounting policies for E&E costs, thus undermining comparability. We review the IFRS annual reports of a large number of firms, looking for different policies. We identify many distinguishable methods of accounting. Along with this, we discover that disclosures are often confusing, partly because of the lack of definitions in IFRS 6. To aid insight into this complexity, we prepare a classification of these methods and give real examples of each. We then assess the methods in the context of IFRS 6 and other relevant parts of IFRS. We find that nearly all the methods comply with IFRS. This leads us to a proposal for narrowing the variety of practice by withdrawing IFRS 6, and putting E&E costs within the scope of IAS 38 Intangible Assets. As part of this, IAS 38 could be further revised to extend the scope of capitalisation of other development costs, thereby addressing one of the criticisms of current reporting practice and bringing IAS 38 more into line with the latest version of the Conceptual Framework. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Accounting Review Wiley

Towards a Solution to the Variety in Accounting Practices of Extractive Firms under IFRS

Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/towards-a-solution-to-the-variety-in-accounting-practices-of-TRjY2OaNex
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2021 CPA Australia Ltd (CPA Australia)
ISSN
1035-6908
eISSN
1835-2561
DOI
10.1111/auar.12348
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Accounting for exploration and evaluation (E&E) costs is one of the last major issues to remain largely unregulated by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), even though extractive firms are an important part of several big stock markets. Under a temporary permissive standard (IFRS 6), which has been in place since 2004, firms use a wide range of accounting policies for E&E costs, thus undermining comparability. We review the IFRS annual reports of a large number of firms, looking for different policies. We identify many distinguishable methods of accounting. Along with this, we discover that disclosures are often confusing, partly because of the lack of definitions in IFRS 6. To aid insight into this complexity, we prepare a classification of these methods and give real examples of each. We then assess the methods in the context of IFRS 6 and other relevant parts of IFRS. We find that nearly all the methods comply with IFRS. This leads us to a proposal for narrowing the variety of practice by withdrawing IFRS 6, and putting E&E costs within the scope of IAS 38 Intangible Assets. As part of this, IAS 38 could be further revised to extend the scope of capitalisation of other development costs, thereby addressing one of the criticisms of current reporting practice and bringing IAS 38 more into line with the latest version of the Conceptual Framework.

Journal

Australian Accounting Review – Wiley

Published: Dec 1, 2021

References

  • Accounting for Extractive Industries: Has IFRS 6 Harmonised Accounting Practices by Extractive Industries?
    Abdo, H.
  • Value‐relevance of Nonfinancial information: The Wireless Communications Industry
    Amir, E.; Lev, B.
  • Do Financial Analysts Get Intangibles?
    Amir, E.; Lev, B.; Sougiannis, T.
  • IFRS – 10 Years Later
    Ball, R.
  • The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings
    Basu, S.
  • Has the Importance of Intangibles Really Grown? And If So, Why?
    Basu, S.; Waymire, G.
  • IFRS in Practice: An Overview of IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources
  • Discussion Paper DP/2010/1: Extractive Activities
    Brady, G.; Davel, R.; Ludolph, S.; Lundgaard, A.; Spencer, J.; Walsh, M.
  • Powerful Players: How Constituents Captured the Setting of IFRS 6, An Accounting Standard for the Extractive Industries
    Cortese, C.L.; Irvine, H.J.; Kaidonis, M.A.
  • Standardizing Oil and Gas Accounting in the US in the 1970s: Insights from the Perspective of Regulatory Capture
    Cortese, C.L.
  • Rational Economic Behavior and Lobbying on Accounting Issues: Evidence from the Oil and Gas Industry
    Deakin, E.B.
  • SFAS 19: Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies
  • Intangible Assets and Firms' Disclosures: An Empirical Investigation
    Gelb, D.S.
  • The SEC Decision Not to Support SFAS 19: A Case Study of the Effect of Lobbying on Standard Setting
    Gorton, D.E.
  • Extractive Industries Reporting: A review of Accounting Challenges and the Research Literature
    Gray, S.J.; Hellman, N.; Ivanova, M.N.
  • Work Plan 2017–2021
  • Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
  • Staff Paper, February Board, Agenda ref 19
  • Exposure Draft ED/2021/3: Disclosure Requirements in IFRS Standards – A Pilot Approach
  • Summary of Issues: Extractive Industries
  • Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves
  • Global Mining Reporting Survey 2006
  • The Development of Accounting Regulation in the Extractive Industries: An International Review
    Luther, R.
  • IFRS Ten Years On: Has the IASB Imposed Extensive Use of Fair Value? Has the EU Learnt to Love IFRS? And Does the Use of Fair Value Make IFRS Illegal in the EU?
    Nobes, C.W.
  • Accounting for Oil and Gas Exploration, Development, Production and Decommissioning Activities
  • Accounting for Intangible Assets: There is Also an Income Statement
    Penman, S.H.
  • Accounting in the London Stock Exchange's Extractive Industry: The Effect of Policy Diversity on the Value Relevance of Exploration‐Related Disclosures
    Power, S.B.; Cleary, P.; Donnelly, R.
  • Accounting for Intangibles – A Critical Review of Policy Recommendations
    Skinner, D.J.
  • The IASB and Comparability of International Financial Reporting: Research Evidence and Implications
    Tarca, A.
  • What Financial and Non‐financial Information on Intangibles is Value‐relevant? A Review of the Evidence
    Wyatt, A.
  • The SEC Rules Historical Cost Accounting: 1934 to the 1970s
    Zeff, S.A.