Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Rosenau (1992)
Governance Without Government: Governance, order, and change in world politics
P. Lamy (2010)
Global Governance: Getting Us Where We All Want to Go and Getting Us There TogetherGlobal Policy, 1
L. Finkelstein (1995)
What Is Global GovernanceGlobal Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 1
C. Offe (2009)
Governance: An “Empty Signifier”?Constellations, 16
P. Jacquet, J. Pisani-ferry, L. Tubiana (2003)
À la recherche de la gouvernance mondiale, 70
Pant Pant (2010)
The Nuclear Treaty?s Trembling FoundationsInternational Herald Tribune
F. Cerutti (2011)
The deeper roots of legitimacy and its futureReview of International Political Economy, 18
Rorden Wilkinson (2011)
Global Governance, for whom? A response to LamyGlobal Policy, 2
C. Kindleberger (1986)
International Public Good without International GovernmentThe American Economic Review, 76
Thomas Pogge (2003)
World poverty and human rights : cosmopolitan responsibilities and reformsEthics & International Affairs, 17
Suzanne Schüttemeyer (2011)
Politik im Klimawandel
Kindleberger Kindleberger (1986)
Public Goods without International GovernmentThe American Economic Review, 76
Tom Farer, Timothy Sisk (2010)
Enhancing International Cooperation: Between History and NecessityGlobal Governance, 16
E. Parson (2003)
Protecting the Ozone Layer
K. Richardson, W. Steffen, H. Schellnhuber, J. Alcamo, T. Barker, D. Kammen, R. Leemans, D. Liverman, M. Munasinghe, B. Osman-Elasha, N. Stern, O. Wæver (2009)
Synthesis Report. Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions. Summary of the Copenhagen Climate Change Congress
This article aims at clarifying the rather generic notion of global governance, by keeping its meaning as a problem from its normative usage as a project. Further, priorities should be recognized and policy issues reordered according to their relevance. The current debate easily forgets about two threats, both poisoned remnants of modernity: only nuclear weapons and climate change deserve the name of global challenges, in as much as they can hit everybody on earth and can be addressed only by universal cooperation. They challenge politics to take over an additional role, that is to become politics for the future, for the future generations’ survival under decent conditions. Because of their severity they can motivate political actors to do so in a much more compelling way than the usual array of ‘global’ concerns. There cannot be any global governance without a strategy as to how to address the two global challenges. Policy Implications • Stop using ‘global governance’ as a container for undifferentiated issues of large concern • Rethink politics as a whole, politics‐as‐usual is not adequate to our post‐modern time • To reorder the problems of global governance, recognize the primacy of the two‐only global (and lethal) challenges, the existence of nuclear weapons and man‐made climate change • Promote a learning process in which the concern for future generations and global commons becomes a new motivation for political action • See the real dangers in scientific terms, do not indulge in catastrophism, and do not think of world government as the only safe solution
Global Policy – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.