Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Joseph Farrell, John Hayes, C. Shapiro, Theresa Sullivan, Scott Peterson, J. Lerner, Gilad Ohana, Joseph Kattan, Dan Swanson (2007)
STANDARD SETTING, PATENTS, AND HOLD-UP
Joseph Farrell, Timothy Simcoe (2012)
Choosing the rules for consensus standardization: THE RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICSThe RAND Journal of Economics, 43
K. Blind, N. Thumm (2004)
Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implicationsResearch Policy, 33
Mark Lemley (2002)
Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting OrganizationsCalifornia Law Review, 90
J. Lerner, J. Tirole (2006)
A Model of Forum ShoppingThe American Economic Review, 96
(2006)
Standard Setting and Patent Pools-Their implications for EU Competition Law. IBC Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Justus Baron, Daniel Spulber (2018)
Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center DatabaseMacroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal
Byeongwoo Kang, Rudi Bekkers (2013)
Just-in-time inventions and the development of standards: How firms use opportunistic strategies to obtain standard-essential patents (SEPs)2013 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)
Justus Baron, T. Pohlmann (2018)
Mapping Standards to Patents Using Declarations of Standard‐Essential PatentsERN: Other Microeconomics: Production
K. Kühn, Fiona Morton, Howard Shelanski (2013)
Standard Setting Organizations Can Help Solve the Standard Essential Patents Licensing ProblemAntitrust Chronicle, 3
B. Kang, Rudi Bekkers (2015)
Just-in-time patents and the development of standardsResearch Policy, 44
(2011)
Federal Trade Commission. The evolving IP marketplace: Aligning patent notice and remedies with competition, A Report of the Federal Trade Commission
S. Besen, Leland Johnson (1986)
Compatibility Standards, Competition, and Innovation in the Broadcasting Industry
See 3GPP TR 21.900 for definition
Justus Baron, Daniel Spulber (2015)
The Searle Center Database of Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations
(2015)
Technology standards in the knowledge production function -evidence from 3gpp. mimeo
K. Gupta, Mark Snyder (2014)
Smart Phone Litigation and Standard Essential PatentsLaw
In some cases, the specification is not associated with a specific working group but instead lists the TSG plenary as the responsible party
B. Kang, K. Motohashi (2015)
Essential intellectual property rights and inventors’ involvement in standardizationResearch Policy, 44
A. Leiponen (2006)
Competing through cooperation: Standard setting in wireless telecommunications
Rudi Bekkers (2001)
MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS : GSM, UMTS, TETRA, AND ERMES
(2011)
The evolving IP marketplace: Aligning patent notice and remedies with competition. A Report of the Federal Trade Commission
David Waguespack, L. Fleming (2009)
Scanning the Commons? Evidence on the Benefits to Startups Participating in Open Standards DevelopmentManag. Sci., 55
Nitin Aggarwal, Qizhi Dai, E. Walden (2011)
The More, the Merrier? How the Number of Partners in a Standard-Setting Initiative Affects Shareholder's Risk and ReturnMIS Q., 35
Prasanna Tambe, L. Hitt, Chris Forman
Management Science
One specification may have multiple versions related to different releases and therefore the same spec number may be listed in multiple releases
Daniel Spulber (2008)
Unlocking Technology: Antitrust and InnovationAntitrust: Antitrust Law & Policy
Paul Wakke, K. Blind, Florian Ramel (2012)
The impact of participation within formal standardization on firm performanceJournal of Productivity Analysis, 45
For interested readers, please refer to the specification numbering page on 3GPP website to understand the different categories and types of specifications
Daniel Spulber (2017)
Standard Setting Organizations and Standard Essential Patents: Voting and MarketsNorthwestern University Pritzker School of Law
See 3GPP working procedures
K. Gupta (2015)
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS AND COMPETITION IN THE MOBILE WIRELESS INDUSTRY
P. Larouche, F. Schuett (2016)
Repeated Interaction in Standard SettingERN: Other Microeconomics: Production
Naotoshi Tsukada, Sadao Nagaoka (2011)
Standards as a Knowledge Source for R&D: A first look at their incidence and impacts based on the inventor survey and patent bibliographic data
P. David (1985)
Clio and the Economics of QWERTYThe American Economic Review, 75
A. Leiponen (2008)
Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless TelecommunicationsManag. Sci., 54
Maya Cohen-Meidan (2007)
The effects of standardization process on competition: An event study of the standardization process in the US cable modem marketTelecommunications Policy, 31
Joseph Farrell, C. Shapiro, R. Nelson, R. Noll (1992)
Standard Setting in High-Definition Television, 1992
R. Ranganathan, Lori Rosenkopf (2014)
DO TIES REALLY BIND? THE EFFECT OF KNOWLEDGE AND COMMERCIALIZATION NETWORKS ON OPPOSITION TO STANDARDSAcademy of Management Journal, 57
(2015)
Essential patents and standard dynamics. mimeo
A. Bonatti, Heikki Rantakari (2014)
The Politics of CompromiseO&M: Decision-Making in Organizations eJournal
(2015)
Technology standards in the knowledge production function — Evidence from 3 GPP
Justus Baron, T. Pohlmann (2015)
Mapping Standards to Patents using Databases of Declared Standard-Essential Patents and Systems of Technological Classification
(2015)
Standard setting organizations can help solve the essential patents licensing problem, Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle
Talia Bar, A. Leiponen (2014)
Committee Composition and Networking in Standard Setting: The Case of Wireless TelecommunicationsMacroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal
Appendix A: Database Outline & Table Descriptions
Lori Rosenkopf, Anca Metiu, Varghese George (2001)
From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance FormationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 46
(2013)
Standard setting organizations can help solve the essential patents licensing problem
Timothy Simcoe (2010)
Standard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology PlatformsCyberspace Law eJournal
Rudi Bekkers, J. West (2009)
The limits to IPR standardization policies as evidenced by strategic patenting in UMTSTelecommunications Policy, 33
B. Hjelm (2001)
Standards and Intellectual Property Rights in the Age of Global Communication - A Review of the International Standardization of Third-Generation Mobile SystemArXiv, cs.CY/0109105
Bronwyn Hall, A. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg (2005)
Market value and patent citationsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 36
K. Blind (2011)
An economic analysis of standards competition: The example of the ISO ODF and OOXML standardsTelecommunications Policy, 35
(2014)
Korea's Telecommunications Technology Association (TTA), and Japan's TTC (Telecommunications Technology Committee)
Bar (2014)
Committee composition and networking in standard setting: The case of wireless telecommunicationsJournal of Economics and Management Strategy, 23
M. Weiss, M. Sirbu (1990)
Technological Choice in Voluntary Standards Committees: An Empirical Analysis.Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1
J. Lerner, J. Tirole (2013)
Standard-Essential PatentsJournal of Political Economy, 123
Just - intime inventions and the development of standards : How firms use opportunistic strategies to obtain standardessential patents ( seps )
See Appendix for excerpt from 3GPP Working Procedures, retrieved from: www.3gpp.org/specifications-groups/working-procedures
Rna Bekkers, R. Bongard, A. Nuvolari (2009)
Essential patents in industry standards : the case of UMTS
(2015)
The Mobile Revolution: How Mobile Technologies Drive a Trillion-Dollar Impact
For example, the contribution type field (change request, discussion document, etc.) may be the third variable in one meeting and change to the 10th
Marc Rysman, Timothy Simcoe (2008)
Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting OrganizationsManag. Sci., 54
Justus Baron, Yann Ménière, T. Pohlmann (2014)
Standards, consortia, and innovationInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 36
Brian DeLacey, K. Herman, D. Kiron, J. Lerner (2006)
Strategic Behavior in Standard-Setting OrganizationsIO: Productivity
J. Farrell, C. Shapiro (1992)
Standard setting in high?definition television. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 23
Henry Delcamp, A. Leiponen (2012)
Innovating Standards Through Informal Consortia: The Case of Wireless TelecommunicationsERPN: Industrial Organization (Topic)
Rudi Bekkers, R. Bongard, A. Nuvolari (2011)
An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Essential Patent Claims in Compatibility StandardsIO: Regulation
K. Blind, A. Mangelsdorf (2013)
Alliance Formation of SMEs: Empirical Evidence From Standardization CommitteesIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60
W. Lehr (1996)
Compatibility Standards And Industry Competition: Two Case StudiesEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 4
(2012)
Reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) royalties, standards selection, and control of market power
Mark Lemley (2006)
Ten Things to do About Patent Holdup of Standards (and One Not To)Boston College Law Review, 48
C. Shapiro (2000)
Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard SettingInnovation Policy and the Economy, 1
(2018)
for a survey, methodological discussion, and presentation of a new compilation of SEP declarations data
K. Gupta (2013)
THE PATENT POLICY DEBATE IN THE HIGH-TECH WORLDJournal of Competition Law and Economics, 9
Mark Lemley, C. Shapiro (2006)
Patent Holdup and Royalty StackingStanford Law School
That is, the number of bits per second can be transmitted over the given amount of spectrum
Neil Gandal, Nataly Gantman, David Genesove (2004)
Intellectual Property and Standardization Committee Participation in the Us Modem IndustryCEPR Discussion Paper Series
Daniel Spulber (2016)
Standard Setting Organizations and Standard Essential Patents: Voting Power versus Market Power
The underlying 3G technology in 3GPP standards is called wideband CDMA (WCDMA), and the specifications are often referred to as
Benjamin Chiao, J. Tirole, J. Lerner (2005)
The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical AnalysisEnvironment for Innovation eJournal
J. Farrell, T. Simcoe (2012)
Choosing the rules for consensus standardization, 43
This paper describes a new database with detailed information on standardization procedures at the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). 3GPP is the most relevant standard‐setting organization (SSO) in the field of mobile telecommunications. Empirical research on technology standards and SSOs has so far been limited by the scarcity of available data. The present database contains information on membership, meeting attendance, chairmanship, work items, contributions, and votes at 3GPP. These data shed light on the technical complexity of standard development and illustrate the importance of voluntary contributions from SSO members. The data allow addressing important policy questions regarding the regulation of voluntary SSOs and the role of standard‐essential patents in standardization.
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.