Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Ureteric stenting 25 years on: routine or risky?

Ureteric stenting 25 years on: routine or risky? Background: Ureteric stents have been used in urological practice for over 25 years and in many cases have become almost routine. The purpose of the present review is to highlight the uses, complications and risk management issues associated with their use. Methods: An extensive literature review was conducted and knowledge from past experience was accessed to give a summary of past and current ureteric stent use in urology. Results: Broadly, there are stone and non‐stone indications for stenting. Complications may range from the commonly experienced ‘stent syndrome’ to the medico‐legal dilemma of the forgotten stent. Risk management must be applied to all uses of stenting to minimize complications and achieve best practice. Conclusion: Although almost routine in many areas of urological practice, the complications and implications for risk management of ureteric stenting cannot be ignored. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Anz Journal of Surgery Wiley

Ureteric stenting 25 years on: routine or risky?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/ureteric-stenting-25-years-on-routine-or-risky-6VuLdPwN7D

References (42)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1445-1433
eISSN
1445-2197
DOI
10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.02947.x
pmid
15043736
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Background: Ureteric stents have been used in urological practice for over 25 years and in many cases have become almost routine. The purpose of the present review is to highlight the uses, complications and risk management issues associated with their use. Methods: An extensive literature review was conducted and knowledge from past experience was accessed to give a summary of past and current ureteric stent use in urology. Results: Broadly, there are stone and non‐stone indications for stenting. Complications may range from the commonly experienced ‘stent syndrome’ to the medico‐legal dilemma of the forgotten stent. Risk management must be applied to all uses of stenting to minimize complications and achieve best practice. Conclusion: Although almost routine in many areas of urological practice, the complications and implications for risk management of ureteric stenting cannot be ignored.

Journal

Anz Journal of SurgeryWiley

Published: Apr 1, 2004

There are no references for this article.