Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Go, H. Lofgren, Fabian Ramos, S. Robinson (2015)
Estimating Parameters and Structural Change in CGE Models Using a Bayesian Cross-Entropy Estimation ApproachEconometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal
M. Gallaway, C. McDaniel, S. Rivera (2003)
Short?run and long?run industry?level estimates of U.S. Armington elasticities, 14
I. Mongelli, G. Tassielli, B. Notarnicola (2009)
Handbook of input?output economics in industrial ecology
(2022)
Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks
G. Metcalf (1999)
A Distributional Analysis of Green Tax ReformsNational Tax Journal, 52
Christelle Khalaf, G. Jolley, Candi Clouse (2021)
The Economic Impact of Small Colleges on Local Economies: A Guide to Attainable Data and Best PracticesEconomic Development Quarterly, 36
W. Leontief (1986)
Input?output economics
S. Rausch, J. Reilly (2015)
CARBON TAXES, DEFICITS, AND ENERGY POLICY INTERACTIONSNational Tax Journal, 68
Gilbert Michaud, G. Jolley (2019)
Economic Contribution of Ohio’s Wood Industry Cluster: Identifying Opportunities in the Appalachian RegionReview of Regional Studies
Hongxia Zhang, G. Hewings, Xinye Zheng (2019)
The effects of carbon taxation in China: An analysis based on energy input-output model in hybrid unitsEnergy Policy
G. J. Jolley (2022)
Basic income: A 50?state economic impact analysis, 14
G. Jolley, Christelle Khalaf, Gilbert Michaud, D. Belleville (2020)
The economic contribution of logging, forestry, pulp & paper mills, and paper products: A 50-state analysisForest Policy and Economics, 115
P. Aruna, F. Cubbage, K. Abt, C. Redmond (1997)
Regional economic contributions of the forest-based industries in the SouthForest Products Journal, 47
B. C. English, K. Jensen, J. Menard, M. E. Walsh, C. Brandt, J. Van Dyke, S. Hadley (2007)
Economic impacts of carbon taxes and biomass feedstock usage in Southeastern United States coal utilities, 39
M. Muñoz, C. Kouratzoglou, S. Alogoskoufis (2021)
ECB economy?wide climate stress test: Methodology and results
James Henderson, Omkar Joshi, Rajan Parajuli, W. Hubbard (2017)
A regional assessment of wood resource sustainability and potential economic impact of the wood pellet market in the U.S. SouthBiomass & Bioenergy, 105
J. Leatherman, D. Marcouiller (1996)
Income Distribution Characteristics of Rural Economic Sectors: Implications for Local Development PolicyGrowth and Change, 27
S. R. Paynter, G. J. Jolley, A. J. Nousaine (2014)
Policy implications of projecting the multiplier effects of social safety net programs using IMPLAN: Reevaluating the economic impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, 46
Bart Tilley, I. Munn (2007)
2001 Economic Impacts of the Forest Products Industry in the SouthSouthern Journal of Applied Forestry, 31
G. Jolley, Christelle Khalaf, Gilbert Michaud, Austin Sandler (2019)
The economic, fiscal, and workforce impacts of coal‐fired power plant closures in Appalachian OhioRegional Science Policy & Practice
Michael Labissoniere, S. Bowe (2006)
Estimating the impact of foreign competition on the Wisconsin wood furniture industry. Part I. A quantitative input-output analysisForest Products Journal, 56
R. Miller, P. Blair (2009)
Input?output analysis: Foundations and extensions
Gilbert Michaud (2018)
Shale Industry'S Economic Contribution In Ohio, Usa: Implications For Future Activity In The StateRegional Science Inquiry
X. Labandeira, J. Labeaga (2005)
Combining input‐output analysis and micro‐simulation to assess the effects of carbon taxation on Spanish householdsFiscal Studies, 20
Aruna P. B. (1997)
35Forest products journal, 47
K. Perese (2010)
Input?output model analysis: Pricing carbon dioxide emissions. Working Paper Series
E. Dietzenbacher (1997)
In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: A Reinterpretation as a Price ModelJournal of Regional Science, 37
M. Pelkki, G. Sherman (2020)
Forestry's economic contribution in the United States, 2016, 70
J. Oosterhaven (1996)
Leontief versus Ghoshian Price and Quantity ModelsSouthern Economic Journal, 3
(2022)
IMPLAN history
X. Labandeira, J. M. Labeaga (2002)
Estimation and control of Spanish energy?related CO2 emissions: An input?output approach, 30
T. Raa (2005)
The economics of input?output analysis
T. Lester, M. Little, G. Jolley (2015)
Assessing the economic impact of alternative biomass uses: biofuels, wood pellets, and energy production.The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 45
D. Fullerton (1995)
Why Have Separate Environmental Taxes?Tax Policy and the Economy, 10
Jinwon Bae, S. Dall’erba (2016)
The economic impact of a new solar power plant in Arizona: Comparing the input‐output results generated by JEDI vs. IMPLANRegional Science Policy and Practice, 8
Jared Woollacott (2018)
THE ECONOMIC COSTS AND CO-BENEFITS OF CARBON TAXATION: A GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ASSESSMENTClimate Change Economics, 09
Omkar Joshi, James Henderson, S. Tanger, Leslie Boby, M. Pelkki, E. Taylor (2017)
A synopsis of methodological variations in economic contribution analyses for forestry and forest-related industries in the US south.Journal of Forestry, 115
The Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) has engaged in scenario analysis that estimates a $200/ton carbon tax would be required to transition to net zero carbon by 2050. Using a $200/ton carbon tax as a base, this paper uses input–output (IO) modeling to generate price and revenue effects of a carbon tax. Results from these models, which can only be interpreted as the short‐run, upper‐bound effects of the carbon tax policy, imply that in response to a $200/ton tax on CO2e emissions, carbon‐intensive industries, such as agriculture, extraction, transportation, utilities, and chemicals, may experience price increases in the range of 10‐30 percent. Other industries will also experience price increases, but to a lesser degree, due to increased input costs associated with the tax. In addition, modeling results also suggest that industries facing elastic pricing regimes may face similar‐sized declines in revenues as a consequence of the carbon tax. Rank‐ordered impact results from these models can be utilized by bank supervisors and firms to adequately plan for sectoral‐level transition risk within their lending and/or investment portfolios.
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2023
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.