Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
James Anderson (1979)
A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity EquationThe American Economic Review, 69
(1998)
Market Access, Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Assessment
J. Bergstrand (1989)
The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International TradeThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 71
E. Helpman (1987)
Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countriesJournal of The Japanese and International Economies, 1
Lead footnote: Feenstra is Professor of Economics at U.C. Davis, and Director of the International Trade and Investment Program of the NBER. Markusen is Professor of Economics
A. Venables (1985)
Trade and trade policy with imperfect competition : the case of identical products and free entryJournal of International Economics, 19
J. Markusen (1981)
TRADE AND THE GAINS FROM TRADE WITH IMPERFECT COMPETITIONWorld Scientific Studies in International Economics
J. Markusen, A. Venables (1988)
Trade policy with increasing returns and imperfect competition: Contradictory results from competing assumptionsJournal of International Economics, 24
James Brander, P. Krugman (1983)
A ‘reciprocal dumping’ model of international tradeJournal of International Economics, 15
J. Bergstrand (1985)
The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical EvidenceThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 67
James Rauch (1996)
Networks Versus Markets in International TradeERN: Networks (Topic)
J. Sachs, Andrew Warner (1995)
Natural Resource Abundance and Economic GrowthEconomic Growth
David Hummels, J. Levinsohn (1993)
Monopolistic Competition and International Trade: Reconsidering the EvidenceNBER Working Paper Series
(1998)
The Home Market Effect, Trade, and Industrial Structure
(1979)
1 This specialization can arise due to an Armington structure of demand
James Brander (1981)
Intra-Industry Trade in Identical CommoditiesJournal of International Economics, 11
R. Feenstra, J. Markusen, A. Rose (1998)
Undertstanding the Home Market Effect and the Gravity Equation: the Role of Differentiating GoodsInternational Trade eJournal
James Brander, Helpman, Krugman (1985)
Market structure and foreign trade
Markusen and Rose, 1998) we derive and illustrate the gravity equation for the reciprocal dumping model
J. Eaton, Samuel Kortum (1997)
Technology and Bilateral TradeNBER Working Paper Series
(1998)
Bilateral Trade in a Multilateral World with Imperfect Specialization
K. Head, J. Ries (2001)
Increasing Returns versus National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of US-C
Donald Davis (1995)
Intra-industry trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approachJournal of International Economics, 39
American Economic Association
(1998)
Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” in The Regionalization of the World Economy (ed.: Jeffrey A
J. Markusen, A. Venables (1996)
The Theory of Endowment, Intra-Industry, and Multinational TradeInternational Trade eJournal
S. Evenett, W. Keller (1998)
On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity EquationJournal of Political Economy, 110
(1999)
Armington vs. Krugman: An Empirical Test
J. Frankel (1997)
The Regionalization Of The World Economy
R. Feenstra, R. Lipsey, H. Bowen (1997)
World Trade Flows, 1970-1992, with Production and Tariff DataNBER Working Paper Series
3 Factor price equalization obtains, for example, if there is a single factor and both countries are producing the numeraire y good, which is traded without transportation costs
The simple gravity equation explains a great deal about the data on bilateral trade flows and is consistent with several theoretical models of trade. We argue that alternative theories nevertheless predict subtle differences in key parameter values, depending on whether goods are homogeneous or differentiated and whether or not there are barriers to entry. Our empirical work for differentiated goods delivers results consistent with the theoretical predictions of the monopolistic‐competition model, or a reciprocal‐dumping model with free entry. Homogeneous goods are described by a model with national (Armington) product differentiation or by a reciprocal‐dumping model with barriers to entry. JEL Classification: F10, F12
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'économique – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.