Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Klaus Friesenbichler, M. Peneder (2016)
Innovation, Competition and ProductivityInstitutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal
(2002)
Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: A company level innovation study
(2003)
Innovations and productivity growth in the UK: Evidence
M. Parisi, F. Schiantarelli, A. Sembenelli (2006)
Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for ItalyEuropean Economic Review, 50
N. Stojčić, Iraj Hashi (2014)
Firm Productivity and Type of Innovation: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 6Croatian Economic Survey, 16
G. Jefferson, Huamao Bai, Xiaojing Guan, Xiaoyun Yu (2006)
R&D Performance in Chinese industryEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 15
George Leeuwen, L. Klomp (2006)
On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivity growthEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 15
Iraj Hashi, N. Stojčić (2013)
The Impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4CASE Network Studies and Analyses
(2001)
Science, technology and industry outlook: Drivers of growth – information technology, innovation and entrepreneurship’, Paris: OECD
L. Klomp, George Leeuwen (2001)
Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New ApproachInternational Journal of the Economics of Business, 8
W. Bessler, Claudia Bittelmeyer (2008)
Patents and the performance of technology firms: Evidence from initial public offerings in GermanyFinancial Markets and Portfolio Management, 22
Z. Griliches (1998)
Productivity, R&D, and the Data ConstraintThe American Economic Review, 84
Community Innovation Survey 2008 synthesis quality report
(2010)
‘ Inovation and dynamism
Felix Lessambo (2015)
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
(2006)
Knowledge capital and heterogeneity in fi rm performance
Z. Griliches (1979)
Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth
(2015)
The relationship between innovation and productivity conditional to R&D and ICT use’, Revue economique, 6/2015(66), pp
Jose Benavente (2006)
The role of research and innovation in promoting productivity in chileEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 15
J. Heckman (1976)
The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such ModelsAnnals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5
(2004)
Company level innovation and productivity-Is there a common story across countries?' ZEW Discussion Papers No. 03-26
J. J. Heckman (1979)
Structural Analysis of Discrete Data
Z. Griliches (1988)
Productivity Puzzles and R&D: Another NonexplanationJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2
Z. Griliches, J. Mairesse (1998)
Econometrics and Economic Theory in the Twentieth Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium
Harsha Aturupane (1994)
Poverty, human development and growth : an emerging consensus?The American Economic Review, 84
(2006)
The Authors Economics of Transition Ó 2017 The European Bank for Reconstruction
(2001)
‘ Linking innovation and company performance : A new approach
(1979)
Statistical models for discrete panel data
J. Kornai (2010)
Interaction between Systems and Technical Progressinnovation and DynamismWiley-Blackwell: Economics of Transition
H. Chandler (1985)
DatabaseJournal of Learning Disabilities, 18
Volos, A. Kokkinou (2006)
Innovation and Productivity
Press Release database: Community Innovation Survey
N. Janz, Hans Lööf, Bettina Peters (2003)
Firm Level Innovation and Productivity - is There a Common Story Across Countries?Microeconomic Theory eJournal
B. Johansson, Hans Lööf (2009)
Innovation, RaD and Productivity - assessing alternative specifications of CDM-models
Bruno Crépon, Emmanuel Duguet, J. Mairesse (1998)
Research, Innovation, and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm LevelNBER Working Paper Series
(2004)
Company level innovation and productivity—Is there a common story across countries?
P. Mohnen, J. Mairesse, Marcel Dagenais (2006)
Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countriesEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 15
Hans Lööf, A. Heshmati (2006)
On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysisEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 15
(2006)
Knowledge capital and heterogeneity in firm performance. A sensitivity analysis
(2015)
The relationship between innovation and productivity conditional to R & D and ICT use
Log-likelihood À2
Marcin Kolasa (2008)
Productivity, Innovation and Convergence in PolandIO: Productivity
Z. Griliches, J. Mairesse (1999)
Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: Production Functions: The Search for Identification
Innovations and productivity growth in the UK: Evidence from CIS2 and CIS3
(2014)
Company productivity and type of innovation: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 6’, Croatian Economic Survey, 16(2), pp
(2006)
The Authors Economics of Transition Ó 2017 The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development References Benavente
(1998)
‘ Research and development , innovation and productivity : An econometric analysis at the company level
(1998)
Research and development, innovation
R. Griffith, E. Huergo, J. Mairesse, B. Peters (2006)
Innovation and productivity across four European countries, 22
(2006)
R&D performance in Chinese
(2001)
Linking innovation and company performance: A
Hans Lööf, A. Heshmati (2002)
Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: : A firm-level innovation studyInternational Journal of Production Economics, 76
R. Griffith, Elena Huergo, J. Mairesse, Bettina (2006)
WORKING PAPER SERIES INNOVATION AND PRODUCTIVITY ACROSS FOUR EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
Science, technology and industry outlook: Drivers of growth -information technology, innovation and entrepreneurship
Ludivine Martin, T. Nguyen-Thi (2015)
The Relationship Between Innovation and Productivity Based on R&D and ict Use: An Empirical Analysis of Firms in LuxembourgRevue économique, 66
(2003)
‘ Innovations and productivity growth in the UK : Evidence from CIS 2 and CIS 3 ’ , CeRiBA Discussion Paper No . EBPF 033 ( 10 ) , London : Centre for Research into Business Activity
The paper uses company level data from the Eurostat's Community Innovation Survey 2008 and applies CDM model in order to estimate the links between R&D engagement, R&D intensity, innovation output and productivity in selected Central and Eastern European Countries – Bulgaria and Romania, and compares their performance with Germany. The results showed that different processes drive company's decision to engage in R&D in Bulgaria and Romania in comparison to Germany; R&D intensity is an important factor of product innovation in the observed CEE countries and product innovation leads to higher productivity in Bulgaria and Romania, while process innovation leads to higher productivity in Bulgaria, but not in Romania.
Economics of Transition and Institutional Change – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2017
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.