Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Who Rallies around the Flag? Nationalist Parties, National Security, and the 2019 Indian Election

Who Rallies around the Flag? Nationalist Parties, National Security, and the 2019 Indian Election National security crises often generate a ‘rally‐around‐the‐flag’ effect, especially under nationalist administrations, but the salience of a security crisis varies within a country. Does exposure to a crisis intensify rallying by fomenting nationalism, inciting hawkishness, and distracting from quotidian economic concerns? Or does exposure deepen dissatisfaction with the incumbent, thereby reducing a rallying effect? We argue the latter using evidence from a difficult test in India. A major pre‐election terrorist attack boosted the nationwide popularity of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the nationalist ruling party. Yet we find that proximity to the victims’ funeral processions, which served as patriotic rallies, substantially reduced BJP support where the party was incumbent. The size and breadth of our observed effects indicate that the social commemoration of the attack, rather than direct personal connections to its victims, fuelled anti‐incumbent sentiment. Mobilizing collective anger after a crisis may dampen rather than augment a rally‐around‐the‐flag effect. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Political Science Wiley

Who Rallies around the Flag? Nationalist Parties, National Security, and the 2019 Indian Election

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/who-rallies-around-the-flag-nationalist-parties-national-security-and-Z09WBjcbgi

References (36)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2023 by the Midwest Political Science Association.
ISSN
0092-5853
eISSN
1540-5907
DOI
10.1111/ajps.12677
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

National security crises often generate a ‘rally‐around‐the‐flag’ effect, especially under nationalist administrations, but the salience of a security crisis varies within a country. Does exposure to a crisis intensify rallying by fomenting nationalism, inciting hawkishness, and distracting from quotidian economic concerns? Or does exposure deepen dissatisfaction with the incumbent, thereby reducing a rallying effect? We argue the latter using evidence from a difficult test in India. A major pre‐election terrorist attack boosted the nationwide popularity of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the nationalist ruling party. Yet we find that proximity to the victims’ funeral processions, which served as patriotic rallies, substantially reduced BJP support where the party was incumbent. The size and breadth of our observed effects indicate that the social commemoration of the attack, rather than direct personal connections to its victims, fuelled anti‐incumbent sentiment. Mobilizing collective anger after a crisis may dampen rather than augment a rally‐around‐the‐flag effect.

Journal

American Journal of Political Science – Wiley

Published: Apr 1, 2023

There are no references for this article.