Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Whole‐of‐block experimentation for evaluating a change to canopy management intended to enhance wine quality

Whole‐of‐block experimentation for evaluating a change to canopy management intended to enhance... Background and Aims: Earlier papers have shown the utility of the whole‐of‐block approach to viticultural experimentation for assessing the relative merits of different mid‐row management strategies to improve vine vigour, and ‘reduced input’ spray programs for the control of fungal disease. Here, a similar approach was used to evaluate alternative canopy management strategies as a means of improving grape and wine quality in a Shiraz vineyard in the Coonawarra region of South Australia. Methods and Results: Two different canopy management strategies were compared: the existing practice of spur pruning to 45–50 buds per vine and shoot trimming (control) in comparison to spur pruning to 35 buds per vine, shoot thinning and shoot trimming (SPST). Contrasting treatment effects, both in terms of treatment response and its spatial extent, were observed during the trial. In 2005, the SPST treatment led to a significant improvement in some fruit quality parameters and a decline in yield. In 2006, significant treatment effects were only observed for bunch weight and the number of berries per bunch. Whilst reasons for these contrasting effects could not be deduced from the available data, it was demonstrated that the inherent variability of vine vigour within the block had a greater effect than the applied treatments. Conclusions: Consistent with the other whole‐of‐block experiments described in this series, we conclude that this experimental approach offers advantages in comparison to plot‐based approaches to viticultural experimentation. The spatial information obtained in this study created a better understanding of inherent vineyard heterogeneity and the effects this has on control options for vine vigour and grape composition than would have derived from a plot‐based experiment. Significance of the Study: This study is the first application of the whole‐of‐block experimental approach to assessment of alternative canopy management options. The work provides further demonstration of the value which accrues through using spatial variability as an experimental tool. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research Wiley

Whole‐of‐block experimentation for evaluating a change to canopy management intended to enhance wine quality

Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/whole-of-block-experimentation-for-evaluating-a-change-to-canopy-eXGFh36Ob1
Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2012 CSIRO Australia
ISSN
1322-7130
eISSN
1755-0238
DOI
10.1111/j.1755-0238.2012.00183.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Background and Aims: Earlier papers have shown the utility of the whole‐of‐block approach to viticultural experimentation for assessing the relative merits of different mid‐row management strategies to improve vine vigour, and ‘reduced input’ spray programs for the control of fungal disease. Here, a similar approach was used to evaluate alternative canopy management strategies as a means of improving grape and wine quality in a Shiraz vineyard in the Coonawarra region of South Australia. Methods and Results: Two different canopy management strategies were compared: the existing practice of spur pruning to 45–50 buds per vine and shoot trimming (control) in comparison to spur pruning to 35 buds per vine, shoot thinning and shoot trimming (SPST). Contrasting treatment effects, both in terms of treatment response and its spatial extent, were observed during the trial. In 2005, the SPST treatment led to a significant improvement in some fruit quality parameters and a decline in yield. In 2006, significant treatment effects were only observed for bunch weight and the number of berries per bunch. Whilst reasons for these contrasting effects could not be deduced from the available data, it was demonstrated that the inherent variability of vine vigour within the block had a greater effect than the applied treatments. Conclusions: Consistent with the other whole‐of‐block experiments described in this series, we conclude that this experimental approach offers advantages in comparison to plot‐based approaches to viticultural experimentation. The spatial information obtained in this study created a better understanding of inherent vineyard heterogeneity and the effects this has on control options for vine vigour and grape composition than would have derived from a plot‐based experiment. Significance of the Study: This study is the first application of the whole‐of‐block experimental approach to assessment of alternative canopy management options. The work provides further demonstration of the value which accrues through using spatial variability as an experimental tool.

Journal

Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research – Wiley

Published: Jun 1, 2012

References

  • The geostatistical analysis of experiments at the landscape‐scale
    Bishop, Bishop; Lark, Lark
  • Understanding variability in winegrape production systems. 2. Within vineyard variation in quality over several vintages
    Bramley, Bramley
  • Understanding variability in winegrape production systems: 1. Within vineyard variation in yield over several years
    Bramley, Bramley; Hamilton, Hamilton
  • Spatial variation in response to ‘reduced input’ spray programs for powdery mildew and botrytis identified through whole‐of‐block experimentation
    Bramley, Bramley; Evans, Evans; Dunne, Dunne; Gobbett, Gobbett
  • Variation in vine vigour, grape yield and vineyard soils and topography as indicators of variation in the chemical composition of grapes, wine and wine sensory attributes
    Bramley, Bramley; Ouzman, Ouzman; Boss, Boss
  • Grapevine dormant pruning weight prediction using remotely sensed data
    Dobrowski, Dobrowski; Ustin, Ustin; Wolpert, Wolpert
  • Low‐resolution remotely sensed images of winegrape vineyards map spatial variability in planimetric canopy area instead of leaf area index
    Hall, Hall; Louis, Louis; Lamb, Lamb
  • Using remote sensing to map grape phenolics and colour in a Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard – the impact of image resolution and vine phenology
    Lamb, Lamb; Weedon, Weedon; Bramley, Bramley
  • Spatio‐temporal variability of some metal concentrations in the soil of eastern England, and implications for soil monitoring
    Lark, Lark; Bellamy, Bellamy; Rawlins, Rawlins
  • Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera L – responses to seasonal water deficits
    Matthews, Matthews; Anderson, Anderson
  • Flower cluster and shoot thinning for crop control in French‐American hybrid grapes
    Morris, Morris; Main, Main; Oswald, Oswald
  • Shoot and cluster thinning influence vegetative growth, fruit yield, and wine quality of ‘Sauvignon blanc’ grapevines
    Naor, Naor; Gal, Gal; Bravdo, Bravdo
  • Viticultural experimentation using whole blocks: evaluation of three floor management options
    Panten, Panten; Bramley, Bramley
  • Enhancing the value of field experimentation through whole‐of‐block designs
    Panten, Panten; Bramley, Bramley; Lark, Lark; Bishop, Bishop
  • Shoot density affects ‘Riesling’ grapevines I. Vine performance
    Reynolds, Reynolds; Edwards, Edwards; Wardle, Wardle; Webster, Webster; Dever, Dever
  • Timing of shoot thinning in Vitis vinifera : impacts on yield and fruit composition variables
    Reynolds, Reynolds; Molek, Molek; De Savigny, De Savigny
  • Berry size and vine water deficits as factors in winegrape composition: anthocyanins and tannins
    Roby, Roby; Harbertson, Harbertson; Adams, Adams; Matthews, Matthews
  • Spectral evaluation of young red wines: anthocyanin equilibria, total phenolics, free and molecular SO 2 , ‘chemical age’
    Somers, Somers; Evans, Evans
  • Establishing management classes for broadacre agricultural production
    Taylor, Taylor; McBratney, McBratney; Whelan, Whelan
  • Shiraz berry size in relation to seed number and implications for juice and wine composition
    Walker, Walker; Blackmore, Blackmore; Clingeleffer, Clingeleffer; Kerridge, Kerridge; Ruhl, Ruhl; Nicholas, Nicholas