Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ellison Ellison, Ellison Ellison (2009)
Search, Obfuscation, and Price Elasticities on the InternetEconometrica, 77
Mossberg Mossberg (2006)
Personal Technology: Ask.com?s New Look Scores Big Points versus RivalsWall Street Journal
Roth Roth (2008)
What Have We Learned from Market Design?Economic Journal, 118
Armstrong (2009)
Prominence and Consumer SearchRand Journal of Economics, 40
Biglaiser (1993)
Middlemen as ExpertsRAND Journal of Economics, 24
Hatfield Hatfield, Milgrom Milgrom (2005)
Matching with ContractsAmerican Economic Review, 95
Roth Roth (2002)
The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design EconomicsEconometrica, 70
Baye (2001)
Information Gatekeepers on the Internet and the Competitiveness of Homogeneous Product MarketsAmerican Economic Review, 91
Rochet Rochet, Tirole Tirole (2003)
Platform Competition in Two?Sided MarketsJournal of the European Economic Association, 1
Spulber Spulber (1996)
Market Microstructure and IntermediationJournal of Economic Perspectives, 10
Caillaud (2001)
Competing CybermediariesEuropean Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 45
Armstrong (2006)
Competition in Two-Sided MarketsRAND Journal of Economics, 37
Evans Evans (2008)
Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and ScholarshipScience, 321
Gehrig Gehrig (1993)
Intermediation in Search MarketsJournal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2
Evans Evans (2003)
The Antitrust Economics of Multi?Sided Platform MarketsYale Journal on Regulation, 20
Hagiu Hagiu (2006)
Pricing and Commitment by Two?Sided PlatformsRand Journal of Economics, 37
Rubinstein Rubinstein, Wolinsky Wolinsky (1987)
MiddlemenQuarterly Journal of Economics, 102
Caillaud (2003)
Chicken and Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service ProvidersRAND Journal of Economics, 34
Hagiu Hagiu (2007)
Merchant or Two?Sided Platform?Review of Network Economics, 6
We analyze the incentives to divert search for an information intermediary who enables buyers (consumers) to search affiliated sellers (stores). We identify two original motives for diverting search (i.e., inducing consumers to search more than they would like): (i) trading off higher total consumer traffic for higher revenues per consumer visit; and (ii) influencing stores’ choices of strategic variables (e.g., pricing). We characterize the conditions under which there would be no role for search diversion as a strategic instrument for the intermediary, thereby showing that it occurs even when the contracting space is significantly enriched. We then discuss several applications related to online and brick‐and‐mortar intermediaries.
The Rand Journal of Economics – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.