Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Anticipated pain as a predictor of discomfort with intrauterine device placement

Anticipated pain as a predictor of discomfort with intrauterine device placement BackgroundIntrauterine devices have been gaining popularity for the past 2 decades. Current data report that >10% of women who use contraception are using an intrauterine device. With <1% failure rates, the intrauterine device is one of the most effective forms of long-acting reversible contraception, yet evidence shows that fear of pain during intrauterine device placement deters women from choosing an intrauterine device as their contraceptive method. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Wolters Kluwer Health

Anticipated pain as a predictor of discomfort with intrauterine device placement

Download PDF
9 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/anticipated-pain-as-a-predictor-of-discomfort-with-intrauterine-device-v6fb1Vcdhh
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc.
ISSN
0002-9378
DOI
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.017
pmid
29079143
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

BackgroundIntrauterine devices have been gaining popularity for the past 2 decades. Current data report that >10% of women who use contraception are using an intrauterine device. With <1% failure rates, the intrauterine device is one of the most effective forms of long-acting reversible contraception, yet evidence shows that fear of pain during intrauterine device placement deters women from choosing an intrauterine device as their contraceptive method.

Journal

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology – Wolters Kluwer Health

Published: Feb 1, 2018

References

  • Contraceptive failure in the United States
    Trussell, J.
  • Two-year continuation of intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants in a mixed-payer setting: a retrospective review
    Sanders, J.N.; Turok, D.K.; Gawron, L.M.; Law, A.; Wen, L.; Lynen, R.
  • Three-year continuation of reversible contraception
    Diedrich, J.T.; Zhao, Q.; Madden, T.; Secura, G.M.; Peipert, J.F.
  • Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013
    Daniels, K.; Daugherty, J.; Jones, J.; Mosher, W.
  • What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study
    Asker, C.; Stokes-Lampard, H.; Beavan, J.; Wilson, S.
  • A comparison of the insertion pain associated with three different types of intrauterine device
    Wiebe, E.R.
  • Severe pain at interval IUD insertion: a case-control analysis of patient risk factors
    Chi, I.C.; Galich, L.F.; Tauber, P.F.
  • Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen
    Hubacher, D.; Reyes, V.; Lillo, S.; Zepeda, A.; Chen, P.L.; Croxatto, H.
  • Patients’ experiences and providers’ observations on pain during intrauterine device insertion
    Akintomide, H.; Brima, N.; Sewell, R.D.; Stephenson, J.M.
  • A prospective cohort study of pain with intrauterine device insertion among women with and without vaginal deliveries
    Allen, R.H.; Carey, M.S.; Raker, C.; Goyal, V.; Matteson, K.
  • Predicting painful or difficult intrauterine device insertion in nulligravid women
    Kaislasuo, J.; Heikinheimo, O.; Lahteenmaki, P.; Suhonen, S.
  • A comparison of the actual and expected pain response following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device
    Goldstuck, N.D.; Matthews, M.L.
  • Use and effectiveness of oral analgesia when fitting an intrauterine device
    Murty, J.
  • Effect of an atraumatic vulsellum versus a single-tooth tenaculum on pain perception during intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial
    Doty, N.; MacIsaac, L.
  • The effects of psychological preparation on pain at intrauterine device insertion
    Newton, J.R.; Reading, A.E.
  • The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception
    Secura, G.M.; Allsworth, J.E.; Madden, T.; Mullersman, J.L.; Peipert, J.F.
  • A comparison of anticipatory and postprocedure pain perception in patients who undergo urodynamic procedures
    Ellerkmann, R.M.; McBride, A.W.; Dunn, J.S.
  • The effects of intraurethral lidocaine anesthetic and patient anxiety on pain perception during cystoscopy
    Stein, M.; Lubetkin, D.; Taub, H.C.; Skinner, W.K.; Haberman, J.; Kreutzer, E.R.
  • Patient satisfaction with urodynamics: a qualitation study
    Shaw, C.; Williams, K.; Assassa, P.R.; Jackson, C.
  • Dysmenorrhea
    Dawood, M.Y.
  • Severity of pain and circadian changes in uterine artery blood flow in primary dysmenorrhea
    Celik, H.; Gurates, B.; Parmaksiz, C.
  • Dysmenorrhoea is associated with central changes in otherwise healthy women
    Vincent, K.; Warnaby, C.; Stagg, C.J.; Moore, J.; Kennedy, S.; Tracey, I.
  • Biomarkers of primary dysmenorrhea and herbal formula intervention: an exploratory metabonomics study of blood plasma and urine
    Liu, P.; Duan, J.; Wang, P.
  • Dysmenorrhea in adolescents and young adults: from pathophysiology to pharmacological treatments and management strategies
    Harel, Z.
  • Recent advances in contraception
    Aiken, A.R.; Trussell, J.
  • Effect of cervical lidocaine-prilocaine cream on pain perception during copper T380A intrauterine device insertion among parous women: a randomized double-blind controlled trial
    Abbas, A.M.; Abdellah, M.S.; Khalaf, M.
  • Lidocaine 10% spray to the cervix reduces pain during intrauterine device insertion: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Aksoy, H.; Aksoy, U.; Ozyurt, S.; Acmaz, G.; Babayigit, M.
  • Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion
    Lopez, L.M.; Bernholc, A.; Zeng, Y.
  • Self-administered lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial
    Rapkin, R.B.; Achilles, S.L.; Schwarz, E.B.
  • Lidocaine gel vs lidocaine spray in reducing pain during insertion of the intrauterine contraceptive device
    Torky, H.; Moussa, A.; El-Desouky, E.S.; Dief, O.; Ahmed, A.
  • Lidocaine for pain control during intrauterine device insertion
    Karasu, Y.; Comert, D.K.; Karadag, B.; Ergun, Y.
  • Naproxen Sodium For Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ngo, L.L.; Braaten, K.P.; Eichen, E.; Fortin, J.; Maurer, R.; Goldberg, A.B.
  • Ketorolac for pain control with intrauterine device placement: a randomized controlled trial
    Ngo, L.L.; Ward, K.K.; Mody, S.K.
  • Diclofenac plus lidocaine gel for pain relief during intrauterine device insertion. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study
    Fouda, U.M.; Salah Eldin, N.M.; Elsetohy, K.A.; Tolba, H.A.; Shaban, M.M.; Sobh, S.M.
  • Vaginal misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion in women delivered only by elective cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Abdellah, M.S.; Abbas, A.M.; Hegazy, A.M.; El-Nashar, I.M.
  • A randomized controlled trial of nitrous oxide for intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women
    Singh, R.H.; Thaxton, L.; Carr, S.; Leeman, L.; Schneider, E.; Espey, E.
  • The effect of nitroglycerin on the IUD insertion experience in nulliparous women: a pilot study
    Micks, E.A.; Jensen, J.T.; Bednarek, P.H.
  • Prophylactic ibuprofen does not improve pain with IUD insertion: a randomized trial
    Bednarek, P.H.; Creinin, M.D.; Reeves, M.F.