Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
James Hartigan (1996)
Perverse Consequences of the GATT: Export Subsidies and Switching CostsEconomica, 63
Thomas Prusa (1992)
Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawnJournal of International Economics, 33
P. Klemperer (1987)
Entry Deterrence in Markets with Consumer Switching CostsThe Economic Journal, 97
J. Schott (2000)
The WTO after Seattle
T. To (1994)
Export subsidies and oligopoly with switching costsJournal of International Economics, 37
V. Weizsācker, C. Christian (1984)
The Costs of SubstitutionEconometrica, 52
Jeremy Bulow, J. Geanakoplos, P. Klemperer (1985)
Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and ComplementsJournal of Political Economy, 93
X. Vives (1999)
Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools
P. Klemperer (1992)
Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview with Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics, and International TradeThe Review of Economic Studies, 62
P. Klemperer (1986)
Markets with consumer switching costs
Ruqu Wang, Quan Wen (1998)
Strategic Invasion in Markets with Switching CostsJournal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7
R. Veugelers, H. Vandenbussche (1996)
European Anti-Dumping Policy and the Profitability of National and International CollusionIndustrial Organization & Regulation eJournal
P. Klemperer (1987)
The Competitiveness of Markets with Switching CostsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 18
F. Carlsson, Åsa Löfgren (2006)
Airline choice, switching costs and frequent flyer programmesApplied Economics, 38
Yongmin Chen (1997)
Paying Customers to SwitchJournal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6
J. Tirole (1988)
The Theory of Industrial Organization
(2007)
2007):Wechselkosten, Marktzutritt und strategisches Unternehmensverhalten
(1987)
On Frequent Flyer Programs and Other Loyalty-Inducing Economic Arrangements”, Discussion Paper #1337
Asian firms frequently have to undercut domestic prices and subsidize switching costs in order to obtain a positive market share when entering European and the US markets. Such practices constitute dumping under Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. We demonstrate that the mere existence of an administratively set minimum price, which is frequently used in assessing dumping allegations, protects domestic firms and has the effect of an additional entrance barrier for Asian firms. Consequently, competition policy should reassess GATT's antidumping regulation in order to keep markets open and domestic competition healthy.
The Singapore Economic Review – World Scientific Publishing Company
Published: Jun 1, 2011
Keywords: Industrial policy antidumping switching costs market entry
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.